Alexis Sanchez | Done deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

bond19821982

Last Man Standing champion 2019/20
Joined
Oct 26, 2008
Messages
10,470
Location
Nnc
This argument has one flaw.
City were going to pay 60m for him less than 6 months ago.
Does it matter?

Its a statement signing. If its itching for the rival fans, they better apply some cream !

He is going to have full 2 months rest this summer.
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
41,012
Location
Editing my own posts.
Andy Gray speaking sense. George Boateng sounds like an idiot and says it like if there's a gap now, then there's no chance of that changing in the next 5 years. Because things don't change from season to season in football :lol:
Boateng’s attitude is baffling. I understand journos pushing the click bait “is there a power shift!?” angle, but a former player championing the whole “City are now the power in Manchester/England” schtick because of an impressive half season seems madness to me. They haven’t even been the most successful side of the last 5 years, let alone in the near decade since their takeover. Heck, we’ve technically won more than them in our post Fergie crisis years, even disregarding the whole, you know, being Man Utd thing.

When did this massive footballing landscape shift occur exactly? And where did the idea of it come from? I remember when Chelsea were gonna destroy the very idea of competition after Mourinhos first season, and be the biggest club in the world by 2014. That was fun. Are we doing that again?

And it’s not even Citys fault. They aren’t pushing it. It’s bored journos and pundits desperate for a juicy hot take that are pushing it for them. Its just a little surprising that so few people are calling it out for the nonsense it is. Unless of course they’re merely saving that for the next media cycle, where they mine another 10 + hours of empty fluff coverage discussing how nonsense the thing they made a big deal of was after all.
 
Last edited:

Macern

Pee pee pants
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
13,650
Location
Oslo, Norway
Nice.
A Liverpool mate told me he’s they’ll snatch him. Then I told him that a wee shit club like Liverpool can barely meet half of his wage demands.

Pogba needs to play further up the pitch.
I’d prefer a 4-3-3.. Pogba for me has to play on the left side of a 3, it’s where he is most effective. Then Martial/Sanchez either side of Rom.
Must play a mid 3.

Pog can't play in the midfield 2.

Yes, against fodder it'll do (sometimes), but against even decent opposition it falls apart.
 

Jacko21

Full Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2016
Messages
4,588
Location
Manchester
Don't you love how these people factor in wages despite not doing it for any other transfer.
I swear this only happens when United, Barca or Real are involved.

They also ignore United’s strict internal policy re the structuring of payments, financing of deals etc. People make out like we go in and drop off briefcases full of cash.
 

Loon

:lol:
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
9,256
Location
No-Mark
Okay, I’m getting pulled in, do we still have to wait for the US stock market to open or is that cobblers now?
 

sherrinford

Full Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2017
Messages
1,217
The right.
No need to hold. Post all the lineups!
Martial Lukaku Sanchez
Pogba Lingard
Matic
Shaw Jones Bailly Valencia
De Gea
Is my choice. Sometimes Mata coming in for Lingard and Sanchez playing 10. Sometimes Martial pushing inwards, Lingard right, Sanchez left. Options are there now!
We really do need someone on the right - every player tried there has failed to make an impact - and I’m sure Sanchez would do... more there than what we’ve had. What a waste though. In playing him there, we would be getting the player that struggled at Barcelona rather than the one who thrived at Arsenal. It’s a disappointing thought really. All of Sanchez, Martial, Rashford, Lingard and Pogba prefer to operate in an inside left position. They want to start wide left and move infield, or start infield and drift into space out on that left hand side. The signing of Alexis solves no problems, just exacerbates the ones we already have.
 

Snafu17

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
1,869
The way Sanchez has gone from a brilliant player who will help the already dominating City dominate the Premier League for a considerable future to a money grabbing mercenary who is on the verge of breaking physically, in a space of a weekend, is quite hilarious.
 

Rightnr

Wants players fined for winning away.
Joined
Jan 25, 2015
Messages
14,768
The press really don't like positive news related to us, do they? I never heard Zlatan's package described in £ms based on his salary. Bunch of clowns.
 

eggwithsideburns

Full Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
1,386
Its exciting that this seems very likely. Sanchez starting for us soon, who would have thought that? its very much like the RVP transfer for me. I just never pictured it.
 

RepardReece

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
1,423
Love how the media is trying to spin Sanchez as a complete waste of money it's hilarious.
Its flipping hilarious isn't it? Kinda funny how everyone makes out a player to be a great signing until they look like they are going to Manchester United. It's funny being the most hated team in the Prem.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,563
Location
Canada
We really do need someone on the right - every player tried there has failed to make an impact - and I’m sure Sanchez would do... more there than what we’ve had. What a waste though. In playing him there, we would be getting the player that struggled at Barcelona rather than the one who thrived at Arsenal. It’s a disappointing thought really. All of Sanchez, Martial, Rashford, Lingard and Pogba prefer to operate in an inside left position. They want to start wide left and move infield, or start infield and drift into space out on that left hand side. The signing of Alexis solves no problems, just exacerbates the ones we already have.
Debatable. Wenger himself said before he thinks Sanchez can be better on the right then the left, but he always had Ozil who was more comfortable on the right and drifting inwards and a few others who could play on the right better. The reason for struggles at Barca was more stylistically (which is weird why Pep wanted him so much now). He's a lot more suited to Mourinho's style rather then Peps. Sanchez likes getting on the ball and doing a lot on his own, twisting and turning and dribbling the ball around. Pep likes pass and move to open space and always unselfish. Sanchez likes to force the game in attack, which IMO is exactly what we need for Mourinho's style. So yeah, not a waste at all. I think it's exactly what we need and will fit in perfectly.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,477
Location
Manchester
The whole "he's chosen money first" angle makes no sense for the simple fact that if money was all he was bothered about he'd stay where he is for another 4 and a bit months and get free agent signing money.
 

swooshboy

Band of Brothers
Joined
Aug 3, 2004
Messages
10,790
Location
London
We really do need someone on the right - every player tried there has failed to make an impact - and I’m sure Sanchez would do... more there than what we’ve had. What a waste though. In playing him there, we would be getting the player that struggled at Barcelona rather than the one who thrived at Arsenal. It’s a disappointing thought really. All of Sanchez, Martial, Rashford, Lingard and Pogba prefer to operate in an inside left position. They want to start wide left and move infield, or start infield and drift into space out on that left hand side. The signing of Alexis solves no problems, just exacerbates the ones we already have.
Am pretty sure Lingard would prefer #10, Martial would prefer #9, and I don't think Pogba should be pushed to one side.
 

Adzzz

Astrophysical Genius - Hard for Grinner
Staff
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
32,781
Location
Kebab Shop
The whole "he's chosen money first" angle makes no sense for the simple fact that if money was all he was bothered about he'd stay where he is for another 4 and a bit months and get free agent signing money.
Come now, common sense is banned from transfer discussions.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,640
How fecking bitter is the media because he’s joining United, it’s like they’ve been personally insulted. I’m really pissed off with this ‘City are saints’ bullshit, they’re all lining up to suck Pep’s balls.

Money or City must be the worst phrase ever used when their whole club and the sole perpose of Pep being there is the Saudi money.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
How's our £500m bid for Neymar going?
 

pseudo_canadian

Full Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
18,934
Location
New England
The whole "he's chosen money first" angle makes no sense for the simple fact that if money was all he was bothered about he'd stay where he is for another 4 and a bit months and get free agent signing money.
Yeah, it's such a lazy argument that's always bothered me.
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
Boateng’s attitude is baffling. I understand journos pushing the click bait “is there a power shift!?” angle, but a former player championing the whole “City are now the power in Manchester/England” schtick because of an impressive half season seems madness to me. They haven’t even been the most successful side of the last 5 years, let alone in the near decade since their takeover. Heck, we’ve technically won more than them in our post Fergie crisis years, even disregarding the whole, you know, being Man Utd thing.

When did this massive footballing landscape shift occur exactly? And where did the idea of it come from? I remember when Chelsea were gonna destroy the very idea of competition after Mourinhos first season, and be the biggest club in the world by 2014. That was fun. Are we doing that again?

And it’s not even Citys fault. They aren’t pushing it. It’s bored journos and pundits desperate for a juicy hot take that are pushing it for them. Its just a little surprising that so few people are calling it out for the nonsense it is. Unless of course they’re merely saving that for the next media cycle, where they mine another 10 + hours of empty fluff coverage discussing how nonsense the thing they made a big deal of was after all.
Great post.

It's an unpopular opinion, but journos do get paid off to slant things a certain way.

This happens throughout all entertainment journalism, and I would strongly suggest that city's PR team have had a vested interest in boosting their public image over United's (if possible).

It appears obvious to me that large portions of the media are making a quite transparent attempt to paint city as a 'good thing for English footy', and Utd as a bad thing.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,640
Atleast he gets a good rest in the summer with no World Cup, sounds selfish but having him fresh going into a new season could be huge for us.
 

bosnian_red

Worst scout to ever exist
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
58,563
Location
Canada
Sane - Aguero - Sterling

Vs

Martial - Lukaku - Sanchez


Vs

Hazard - Morata - Willian/Pedro


Vs

Ali - Kane - Son


Vs

Salah - Firmino - Mane


Vs

......... Lacazette...............



Now, we are not looking so bad at all.
Might as well include the main creative mid too. Pogba for us, KDB for City, Eriksen for Spurs, soon to be Keita for Liverpool, Fabregas for Chelsea.... Ramsey/Wilshere for Arsenal. They really need to rebuild quite a bit. But that front 4 is looking brilliant now. As good as any of them IMO.
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,270
Location
Australia
Real talk though - is this the most high profile Jan signing ever?

Edit: After Mata of course.
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,107
Location
NYC
How fecking bitter is the media because he’s joining United, it’s like they’ve been personally insulted. I’m really pissed off with this ‘City are saints’ bullshit, they’re all lining up to suck Pep’s balls.

Money or City must be the worst phrase ever used when their whole club and the sole perpose of Pep being there is the Saudi money.
Abu Dhabi my friend, Abu Dhabi...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.