ManUArfa
Full Member
The shadow left by SAF
I see, thanks for the info.Their owner is extremely intelligent/savvy - think literally the polar opposite of the Glazers in every way.
One of the pioneers of data-anaylitics in sports in American Baseball, for example. And by extension, very possibly a huge influence in the eventual usage of said methods in football.
So who are you leveling that at ? As you can leave ole out (as much as it may or may not kill you too) and there's no point including dozy Dave as he only got his boy from Everton, so these top players have all come under supposed top top managers and stagnated, like mata, rvp, Angel, Alexis, Fred to a degree but has improved a fair bit under Ole, Pogba, Mkhitaryan, Depay, Martial, Lukaku.
Ole has gotten the players he got in playing well and even ones here who stagnate under the so called top top managers lvg and jose, like Martial, best case to use.
So that's two top managers and major winners that haven't being able to get the best out of "good players" with different coaching teams and styles, ever think it time to start look at these "good players" and the clowns ed and glaziers who gives them stupid high wages as the reason they "stagnate" ? Long term contract, wages you get no where else, where's the motivation coming from to improve or play at the level that got you here.
Imo the Glazers.
Their ultimate objective is to make money, not silverwares nor beautiful football. With our super large fanbase they don't need any of those to make money anyway.
After they squeeze out the last drop they will just sell the club. It didn't cost them much in the first place anyway. I still remember they bought United for £790m but with £660m debt in the club name. So barely £130m was their money. How much United would cost now? At least £3bn I think.
Has any club with such owners win a big silverware? No I guess. And I don't think there'd ever be one.
P/s: I forgot we did win big silverwares under the Glazers. But imo it was because the sheer brilliance of SAF. And the market and football back then was very different. Plus someone like SAF, imo was a one time wonder and won't happen again. Especially in the current circumstances.
I don't understand why fans insist that title winning side wasn't good. We blew City away that season and finished on our record points total. It was a good team but of course an aging side. There was definitely enough there to work with. Is it SAF's fault Woodward and Moyes fecked up the first summer?SAF.
As much as we love the man, and he was a genius, he left is with a league winning squad that should never have and a new manager who... Well should never have
We have been playing catch up since
Ole has bought a bit of calm back and seems to have steadied the ship.
I do believe it was a 3 year plan hence Oles contract.
We have slowly git the players but will we get a new manager after Oles tenure or will it be Ole for the future?
No imo not. Barca, Madrid, Juve, Bayern, ATM, Inter etc. their objective is silverwares.Which is the same for 99% of all clubs, across all sports, the only ones that it doesn't apply to; PSG, Chelsea, City et al, are all backed by dodgy money.
True you can't change the past, but far so called better top managers have also failed with some/most of these players in the points you make out, so hence why I said its time too start looking at the players.Who. The current coaching set up.
I am not talking about the past. Can't do anything about that.
But the current coaching team are in my opinion failing to:
Get the best out of the squad and individual players. What has happened to James, DDG, Pogba to name just a few.
Transform United into a high performing team. 66 points is hardly high performing.
Evolve the tactics before and during the game. What is our playing style? And why do we find it almost impossible to break teams down.
We are certainly not better than the sum of our parts.
We have a big fan base, one of the biggest fan bases and you expect everyone to sing from the same sheet?
I have also seen Ole out trending on twitter alot of times, does that mean the board is going to be forced to sack him?
I have seen sign messi trending, does that mean we will sign him?
You do realise the board is meant to employ people to work on United and decisions are made there and not because twitter fans said so? Are you that naive into thinking that decisions are made from looking at twitter?
Sancho, it's because the club has shown interest in the player, Ole wants him, we all know he is the perfect fit on the right. Pressure or not he is 20 so there is re-sale value just like Pogba.
Did you see sign Dybala last season? No because the club had said no, this is not happening.
Our fan base is toxic if you think all twitter fans are United fans. That is only a portion of fans.
i agree, the fanbase is too broad and divided. it was reaching feverpitch earlier this year when Woodward was getting stick, as soon as we signed Bruno it completely disappeared. Then you see fan channels saying Glazers out while wearing the latest utd shirtThe fanbase for giving up protesting/raising awareness of the Glazer ownership. The power is with the people; the problem is the fanbase isn't determined/collective enough to force change like the Scousers were with Hicks and Gillett. The likes of MUST need to do a lot more also.
Disagree. They are in a small minority and being vocal on the CAF, Reddit and Twitter. They are not important. Right now, it is 100% the Glazers! We are being parked with indecisive ignorance. And the only one who is going to pay is Ole. And the Club.Toxic online fandom.
Woodward being too much of a dick. And Ole being too much of a pussy.
If Glazers replaced Woody with CEO who understood football, like VDS at Ajax, could this be fixed? Maybe split the CEO job between football and commercial side giving VDS responsibility for running football side of things, and Woody keeping his banking expertise for commercial contracts & debt management. Woody could set things like budget for player & technical staff salaries & fees. VDS would spend the money and run a transfer kitty pot which Woody wouldn't be able to steal from.The decision makers at the club, they got it wrong in the first place from SAF's successor, allowing SAF to pick his successor. No other club does that even when replacing a legend. A lot of that was down to not having football people involved in running the club. Would Bayern have allowed their previous manager to pick David Moyes. No chance.
Yeah it could probably be put right pretty easily.If Glazers replaced Woody with CEO who understood football, like VDS at Ajax, could this be fixed? Maybe split the CEO job between football and commercial side giving VDS responsibility for running football side of things, and Woody keeping his banking expertise for commercial contracts & debt management. Woody could set things like budget for player & technical staff salaries & fees. VDS would spend the money and run a transfer kitty pot which Woody wouldn't be able to steal from.
All of the above, yeah. I think we've somewhat tried to rectify some of the above with Murtough's appointment, but we're playing catchup and left it far too late.A year on, the question remains.
It's easy to point to Ole - he is holding us back on the pitch ultimately.
However I think he's merely a symptom of the bigger problem - the poor running of the club. Successive poor managerial appointments, no sense of planning in footballing structure or recruitment. The aura of stability, or the acceptance of mediocrity, leading to delayed decisions in replacing staff and players.
Where does the buck stop? It's probably the Glazers right?