devilish
Juventus fan who used to support United
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2002
- Messages
- 62,982
the board chose those those managers + they gave them carte blanched to do whatever they wantI don't see Ole's name, Jose's name...but I see Rangnick's name...
the board chose those those managers + they gave them carte blanched to do whatever they wantI don't see Ole's name, Jose's name...but I see Rangnick's name...
This. The owner spent over a billion in net transfer fee alone for the past 10 years, let alone sign on fee, agent fee and wages. However they are responsible for the appointment of Woodward though, but definitely it is Woodward to me.The owners have spent a LOT of money. Woodward and co are the ones to blame for this mess.
Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.
'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'
Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
Agreed.
Jesus when I said it was like a cult I didn't even think it was this bad. My days...
Why should we not be allowed to say anything against SAF?It has nothing to do with being a cult, it’s about being self aware and actually having an understanding of why the club is even the massive draw it is now. Clueless supporters like yourself blaming an 80 year old legend for our club’s problems need to sit down and shut it. You’re cowards bleeping on about it on red cafe, have the guts to say it in person then. Blind and coward supporters like you don’t have it in you to do that.
Such a bollox. Is SAF a god that cannot do any wrong ? This is cult like behaviour. Maybe him signing duds like Bebe, Manucho and friends also a right move too.He's a human after all. Him hiring Moyes was already a mistake in the first place.You’re not a real United supporter, end of.
Moves was not 1st, 2nd or 3rd choice.Such a bollox. Is SAF a god that cannot do any wrong ? This is cult like behaviour. Maybe him signing duds like Bebe, Manucho and friends also a right move too.He's a human after all. Him hiring Moyes was already a mistake in the first place.
Thing looked like total shit on August. We just lost the Europa final with one of the most shameful display I have ever seen from United team. The rot had started before this season. People really thought we were playing like prime Barca before Ronaldo came.Just when we were starting to make some progress after 8 years last year, we sign Ronaldo which blows all plans out the water. We now find ourselves with a crazy scientist Coach with a highly unusual formation yet without the players to implement it. So in the space of 5 months, we have self imploded from things starting to look bright in august 2021 to this sad hole now.
Ferguson deserves a lot more blame than he gets but our fans consider it sacrilege to say anything negative about the man. Even putting aside the Rock of Gibraltar and shielding of the Glazers, the "no value in the market" nonsense as City propelled themselves into a superpower - his recruitment, even for what little United were spending was just not good enough from 2007 on. It left us with an aging squad with inflated expectations. Most of the big hitters were finished at the top level within two years of his departure. Those who we moved on did nothing of note anywhere else. The only top player left behind was De Gea.
No, Moyes' way was toxic, the whole chips thing showed David Moyes' priorities - he was attempting to 'stamp his authority' by focusing on side issues and other matters that were more or less irrelevant. The man was completely unsuited for dealing with a squad of winners who may have been set in their ways but were professional enough to rally around a confident and qualified manager.I think when SAF was here, the players knew his power was absolute so if he gave them some leeway on somethings they knew not to take the piss. When he left and the manager became much more disposable the players started taking advantage.
I always remember a story about Moyes falling out with the players because he told them they couldn't have chips for a pre game supper, it's not that surprising we've ended up where we have.
Rio Ferdinand: 'David Moyes p****d off the lads by taking away our chips' claims former Manchester United defender
When SAF left I've always felt the stupidest move was not appointing Moyes, but to give him the power to dismanlte one of the most successful backroom teams the club has ever had.
However I do question the wisdom of implementing such demanding tactic with one of the laziest and entitled squads in the EPL mid way into the season especially when we simply lack the personnel to do so and that our players haven't pressed for the past 3 years. Cavani-Ronaldo are ancient, AWB look lost in the opponent's half of the pitch while Maguire has less pace then a frigging tortoise. You don't need to be a genius to acknowledge that this 4-2-2-2 system can't work here, at least, not with the present side
Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.
'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'
Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
Don't think you can silver bullet this. The more this goes on the more you can that an institution there is something NOT right at United in many parts of the organisation.
- A legacy god like figure still exerting his influence over the club (SAF)
- Mind boggling transfers and contract renewals, e.g. Fellaini, Lingard, Mata, Jones, DDG, Di Maria, Falcao, Smalling
- Letting the bricks and mortar assets effectively rot i.e. Old Trafford and Carrington, while the rest of the teams associated with the club play at Leigh Sports Village and The Cliff. Where is the cohesive strategy.
Maybe the Glazers gave too much power to Woodward and were apathetic to their responsibilities as owners rather than just being absent landlords. Woodward as the leading figure of one of the leading sporting institutions globally was out of his depth, he needed support and was either to blind to ask for it or to naive.
What I will never fathom is, as fans we believe (prob rightly so) that the owners are in it for themselves i.e. $$$ Surely the penny must drop at some point you need to get it right ON The pitch to make the Benjamins off it.
Hopefully with Richard Arnold taking the helm we can see a better balance between commercial activity the pursuit of footballing excellence.
Anyone blaming Sir Alex for our problems now should be facing a permanent ban. He made the club what it is now and it has been widely reported by many credible journalists like Stone that he had virtually no more power at the club. He’s a figurehead and a legend enjoying his retirement. Piss off OP for even including Sir Alex. Piss off to anyone who’a gullible enough to believe that he’s still leading any decisions at the club.
After 27 years, he owed this club nothing else when he retired and any competent club run by good owners would have had a proper succession plan in place. This falls firmly onto the glazers. The fact you made a list and included Sir Alex shows you don’t have a clue. You spout nonsense. The simplest argument is usually the most sensible one and it’s the GLAZERS and only them that are the problem.
Posted this elsewhere re Ferguson and the absurd aiming of blame towards him.
'You don't get to simultaneously blame Ferguson and the Glazers. The board have been shown up as utterly incompetent, self interested businessmen and the fact that Ferguson managed to wrangle any degree of control while keeping them in check and keeping us successful is a miracle in itself. This in vogue trend of blaming Ferguson is lazy, embarrassing rubbish. What other manager in the world do you place the demand on to babysit the board and oversee the state of the club as well as win games? Because it can't be both, either you wanted Ferguson to surrender power and relinquish control to this incompetent mob earlier, while he was still manager, or you wanted to be successful for all those years we were. Rubbish, one dimensional thinking, the same as the utter myth that wont flush that he wasn't tactically sound, despite winning 13 titles and hitting 7 CL semi finals, winning it twice. Oh, that was just charisma and man management. Give him a dutch sounding name and you'd be creaming yourself in front of youtube highlights.'
Overall it comes from top down and the loss of Ferguson led to a Woodward and Glazer led drop in standards which has permeated through the club, and is now upheld by players who know little else. Average guys piggy backing on the success and reputation built by Ferguson and real footballers
He recommended Moyes, the owners who had no expertise in building a successful club themselves listened. If they had any sense, which they did not, they would’ve took some lessons from elsewhere and tried to modernize the club at that time but they were lazy because success came easily under Sir Alex.
I'm sorry but I have to disagree and calling for a permanent ban for the many many people who share this view (and it is steadily growing as Utd's problems continue) is ridiculous and an attack on free speech. Let's work backwards through your post: '....it’s the GLAZERS and only them that are the problem.' but wasn't SAF partly responsible for the Glazers in the first place ? and even if not, he hasn't to my knowledge ever spoken out against them - and why would he whilst he gets £ millions a year in his Club Ambassadors role... when Pep leaves City or Klopp moves on from Liverpool, will either of those clubs keep them on the payroll for even just one more day? NO, so why do Utd. do it? It wasn't as if Fergie was badly remunerated whilst he was the Utd. manager - he was consistently the top earning manager in the league year after year.
Re: 'Piss off to anyone who’s gullible enough to believe that he’s still leading any decisions at the club.' well I'm not gullible and its widely accepted that he was a key motivating factor in the return of Ronaldo - which isn't working out too well in my opinion. He also practically forced Ole to make Ronaldo the 1st name on the team sheet following comments made after the Everton game. Do you not agree? You can't say: oh Ole should have been stronger and done his own thing AND at the same time say 'He’s a figurehead and a legend enjoying his retirement' with no influence over things going on at the club. Both can't be right. Plus look what happened to Moyes who did try to do his own thing and bring in his own people, look how well that worked out... (plus SAF set Moyes up to fail by leaving the club in the state he did - yes you can say as Champions, but it was a weird season and RVP was just winning games on his own.) Consider things now, look at Moyes & West Ham now - above Utd. in the table and without spending billions.
You can blame both if one caused the other - google Rock of Gibraltar racehorse dispute.
what has he done again?I rarely open new threads these days because most of the arguments have already been discussed. However I am noticing many finger pointing at one aspect of what's going wrong with Manchester United. While there's truth in what most are saying, I do believe that the issue is far more complex and involves way more people then simply the players etc.
Thus I am going to make a list of what I think is to blame. Starting from the least to the most to blame. You're free to argue pro and against that
8. Rangnick
Rangnick is a fantastic football person. While there are a number of managers who had build great sides some far more successful then Ralph's teams ever were, Rangnick had literally built great clubs. He's a person whose top to bottom vision is second only to that of the likes of prime Sir Alex. That's a valuable asset to have especially in a football world were jobs are often super specialised. Managers had become head coaches, there are DOFs, there are chief scouts, analysts etc. Rangnick is one of the few people left who can do each and every job. His gegenpressing is the way to go. It allows clubs to build a successful side without having to spend ridiculous money on world class players per position while still playing attacking football.
However I do question the wisdom of implementing such demanding tactic with one of the laziest and entitled squads in the EPL mid way into the season especially when we simply lack the personnel to do so and that our players haven't pressed for the past 3 years. Cavani-Ronaldo are ancient, AWB look lost in the opponent's half of the pitch while Maguire has less pace then a frigging tortoise. You don't need to be a genius to acknowledge that this 4-2-2-2 system can't work here, at least, not with the present side
7. SAF
I blame the great man on two things. First of all he left an ageing side and a ridiculously outdated system behind (no DOF, technical director, sporting director etc). That was fine for him as the guy was a one man army but it was set to tank the moment he retired (which would have been sooner rather then later). Secondly its evident that he still have a huge say at OT. At age 80 and with him not being involved in football on a day to day basis that is silly. Football had moved on, the guy had become too sentimental and what worked in his time won't work now.
6. The fans
We fans are Manchester United's last bastion. Most of the people out there are in for the money (salary) or the fame associated being linked with us (pundits etc) but we're the ones who will stick to the club and throw money at it no matter what. Thus we should have a mind of our own and stop applauding mediocracy. We can't win all the time and that's a fact. However there's standards that need to be met and kept no matter whose the employee is. We have too many blood suckers at the club for us to allow others to do the thinking for us.
5. Recruitment
Time and time again we had been promised that we'll be sorting this issue for good. The result of years of reform was a cautious recruitment team who often overspend (salary or/and fee) on proven players who are either not good enough (Maguire, AWB etc) or whose on their big last pay cheque (Ronaldo, Varane, Cavani). Players are human beings. Those not good enough know it and will do anything to defend their highly paid position (leak information, cheat and get people sacked) while players heading towards the end of their career are either impatient for that last trophy or will take care not to get that injury that they would have to carry for the rest of their lives. Not to forget that what one can do in his 20s is not what can one can do in late 30s either
4. Contract guys
Why do we give so much salary to average players? What's the point of it? Players on a huge salary are so difficult to get rid and would be forced upon the next manager. Also what's the brilliance between letting players walk on free instead of selling them before? We risk losing 100-120m worth of talent this year alone!
3. Players
We've got one of the laziest and quite frankly mediocre squads in the EPL, with players insisting in making Championship level mistakes. United leak like a sieve and no one ever takes responsibility of what's going on. That's disgusting.
2. The board
Where do I start? Ah yes, over 1 Billion pounds spent and 4 managers sacked (+ 2 interim) and there's absolutely nothing to show for it. We allowed a failed Cardiff manager to spend 415m on players, it took us 3 years searching for a DOF only to discover Murtough at Carrington and we gave Fletcher 2 promotions in few months. Now there are even rumours of players being able to bypass the manager and speak directly to the board. How silly is that?
1. The owners
I don't hate the owners as much as the typical United fan does. I do think that they have invested in the club and they tried to keep themselves at an arm's length from football matters which is a good thing. However there comes a time when enough is enough. This club had been throwing tons of their own money in the bin for years. Surely a responsible owner would at least bother to look that up and make necessary changes to stop that from happening. Ours simply don't. I know that the likes of Woodward had produced profit on a year basis however waste is still waste and its bad.