PoTMS
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2016
- Messages
- 17,354
Is Pogba really world class though? World class means you turn up against every type of opposition, not just cannon fodder.
No one wants to say it because he has ability and cost a shite load of money, but it's more true than the thread saying the same about Lukaku.
Pogba is a playground footballer. Turns up to show off in games where the opposition are poor enough to allow us the luxury of him doing so. As soon as the team need him however, you can forget it.
He is more interested in inventing silly handshake routines, showing off, and wanting people to look at his hair, than he ever will be in working hard to help his team win a game.
He has the selfishness of a Gerrard or a Ronaldo but without any of the desire, determination, or basic maturity to go with it, and he's 24 years old. It is unlikely at this point he will ever grow up, and that means he will never be more than a liability in any game where it is important for him to put in work for the benefit of the team.
The idea some people have of playing him further forward because he doesn't work hard enough to play in central midfield is a nonsense...as if playing him in another position somehow makes it less important that he works hard. In a succesful team, every player works harder than Paul Pogba ever does.
The fact is that he is on a pedestal as United's best player, but when you look at City (i.e. the team top of the league), if Paul Pogba played for them in the same way he does for United, he would be told to either grow up or feck off. He wouldn't get close to getting a game for them unless he had a serious change of attitude. At United he seems to go completely unchecked for it because he can showboat around onceor twice every ten games, against the likes of Stoke.
Disagree that yest was an anomaly I think a big performance vs a top team would be one
Is Pogba really world class though? World class means you turn up against every type of opposition, not just cannon fodder.
Ummm. Which “top” team has he played against and been so poor before today? Last I remember, he missed our games against Liverpool, Chelsea and City and fans were moaning that we’d have won if he’d played. Then he played against Arsenal and would’ve been MoM if not for the red (which I felt was harsh). Seems revisionist to say he fails against top teams when he’s not really played them at all!
Again, see above. Which team had he failed to “turn up against” before yesterday?
I can understand it if people call a performance poor etc. but to completely diss our best player in this manner is absolutely bizarre. He had some record of going a year+ without featuring in a defeat till yesterday I think. Not too bad for a player-that-we’ll-never-win-the-league-with, eh?
Next year he will be. You see it so often with a Suarez, a Gerrard, a Salah, a De Bruyne, a Rooney or a Greizmann who show flashes of brilliance but still frustrate - then they hit 25/26 and suddenly become the most in form player in EuropeIs Pogba really world class though? World class means you turn up against every type of opposition, not just cannon fodder.
Noods has had it in for Pogba for ages, he’s just been quiet of late for obvious reasons. The fault lies with the manager yesterday. He, again, lined up with no clue. It appears that he relied simply on fielding better football players than Spurs in order to win the game. Starting Lingard over Herrera was a ridiculous decision in such a game. Let’s first get a foothold in the game, and then think about trying to win it.
Hilarious how many people are being wise after the fact when the overwhelming response on first seeing the line-up was “Yay! What a great attacking line-up!”
This place after a defeat is a joke. Spurs away is now one of the toughest games of the season. We were bad but surely last nights result can’t have been so unexpected by so many??
Whilst I agree with you, Spurs record v the Top 6 for the last few years is absolutely terrible.
Why would I speak for anyone else? It’s a stupid line-up for blindingly obvious reasons, which have been demonstrated before, against lesser teams than Spurs.
My lineup prediction had Herrera in for Lingard, largely due to common sense.
Calm down, just needs Jose to catch up with most people and realise that Pogba operates best in a midfield 3 then if he could recognise that Lukaku is not a point forward all should be good. I’m sure he’ll get there eventually, just a little slow on the uptake.
Meh. I’d have had him in there too but I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t excited to see us set up with such an attacking approach. We looked great for about 20 minutes too. For me, the inquest shouldn’t be about tactics or formation but how the second game killed us off completely with a fecking hour left to play.
We will never win the league without a Micheal Carrick replacement
No one wants to say it because he has ability and cost a shite load of money, but it's more true than the thread saying the same about Lukaku.
Pogba is a playground footballer. Turns up to show off in games where the opposition are poor enough to allow us the luxury of him doing so. As soon as the team need him however, you can forget it.
He is more interested in inventing silly handshake routines, showing off, and wanting people to look at his hair, than he ever will be in working hard to help his team win a game.
He has the selfishness of a Gerrard or a Ronaldo but without any of the desire, determination, or basic maturity to go with it, and he's 24 years old. It is unlikely at this point he will ever grow up, and that means he will never be more than a liability in any game where it is important for him to put in work for the benefit of the team.
The idea some people have of playing him further forward because he doesn't work hard enough to play in central midfield is a nonsense...as if playing him in another position somehow makes it less important that he works hard. In a succesful team, every player works harder than Paul Pogba ever does.
The fact is that he is on a pedestal as United's best player, but when you look at City (i.e. the team top of the league), if Paul Pogba played for them in the same way he does for United, he would be told to either grow up or feck off. He wouldn't get close to getting a game for them unless he had a serious change of attitude. At United he seems to go completely unchecked for it because he can showboat around onceor twice every ten games, against the likes of Stoke.
IMO Matic is doing pretty well atm. We are just so imbalanced in the centre of the park especially against elite teams because Pogba is non-existent defensively. We need the extra body to free him up and drop a number 10.
Europa league final.Just write down one big game in which he made an impact.
We don't have anyone when Pogba doesn't deliver. Matić can't play with big intensity, we saw that yesterday. He's dead, too slow after 50-60 mins.
He is literally number 6 in our current team.I'll say this for Pogba... he's not a number 6! Not in any team.
Perhaps a small knee jerk reaction but i really think we need that controller that runs the game. Spurs pressed really good and with the Matic Pogba pivot our midtfield was non-existent.But Matic's inability to controll games hamper us when we play a midtfield two and generally when Pogba doenst show up. The Chuckle Brothers Smalling and Jones struggled immensily with the Spurs pressing and without Fellaini to limp the ball up to we lost the game in midtfield.
Any news on him having an injury? I thought it was interesting that he got the hook after an hour. First time that's happened in his United career, despite previous performances which have been just as bad. Hopefully the kick up the arse he obviously needs.
Of course, the fact his replacement fecking injured himself approximately 30 seconds after coming on the pitch does kind of remove the threat for the foreseeable future...
In a 2 man midfield I agree. He isn't disciplined enough. In a 3 man midfield closer to the opponent's goal....He is world class[/QUOTE
This in a nutshell is the issue , we keep asking him to play in a 2 man midfield a role which he is simply not suitable for and in fact is a liability in.
I think we all agree that he is a class act but we are wasting his talent so much it is criminal.
Debryne is City's best and most influential player so when picking his team Pep chooses Debryne first and puts him in his best position then puts other players in and around him with specific jobs to allow Debryne the freedom to dominate the game and damage the opposition.It feels like We tend to choose the team as a whole and then shoe horn Pogba in, half the time out of position .
Debryne is my tip for the next Ballon'dor I doubt Pogba will even get a mention which is a scandal as he is at least as good .
The team must be built around his strengths or he will continue to flounder especially in the big games ( the games we bought him for remember ) .
I understand why Jose wanted to fit lingard in last night as he has been playing well and scoring goals but putting him in meant pushing Pogba out of his best position this can't go on.
Establish his best position and stick to it or he will remain miles behind Debryne
Meh. I’d have had him in there too but I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t excited to see us set up with such an attacking approach. We looked great for about 20 minutes too. For me, the inquest shouldn’t be about tactics or formation but how the second game killed us off completely with a fecking hour left to play.
Isn't that the point? No one really expects that we'll turn up in matches against good opposition.This place after a defeat is a joke. Spurs away is now one of the toughest games of the season. We were bad but surely last nights result can’t have been so unexpected by so many??