BeforeKeanetherewasRobson
Full Member
Utd District and The Mail.
I feel like I'm almost in the dressing room, listening in.
I feel like I'm almost in the dressing room, listening in.
Oh my godI didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
Last season, United kept five clean sheets in the six league games against City, Chelsea and Liverpool. He’s won four of his nine games against Pep Guardiola. That wasn’t the aspect of his management that used to be doubted. So what has changed? Why have United let in seven goals in two home games in a fortnight against Liverpool and City while being embarrassingly outclassed?
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
I didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
"It’s not about the formation, per se. This has worked for United against City before. Prior to last week’s win at Spurs, the last time they started with a back three in a league game was in March 2020, when they beat City 2-0 with a team strikingly similar to Saturday’s line-up. On that occasion, Brandon Williams started at left wing-back with Luke Shaw replacing Eric Bailly in central defence, Nemanja Matic played instead of Scott McTominay and the front two were Dan James and Anthony Martial (although both Bailly and McTominay came on). The system can work.
But what is different now is context. The back three then felt like a specific plan – United had used it a couple of months earlier in losing at Anfield – rather than a desperate spin of the kaleidoscope, hoping for something to take shape. Nobody can believe this is the way United want to play long-term, because to do so would mean only one of Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Edinson Cavani is ever going to start. It would also mean there is no place at all for poor Jadon Sancho, whom United pursued for 18 months before finally signing amid understandable excitement for £73m.
Last season, United kept five clean sheets in the six league games against City, Chelsea and Liverpool. He’s won four of his nine games against Pep Guardiola. That wasn’t the aspect of his management that used to be doubted. So what has changed? Why have United let in seven goals in two home games in a fortnight against Liverpool and City while being embarrassingly outclassed?
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
But it is only that way because Ole allows it. A strong manager would simply say "I'm the manager now" and make sure he does decide in the end, not SAF. And I don't even think that this would be an issue for SAF himself, I think he respects strength.Say 'No' to Sir Alex Ferguson? He won't even park in the Managers parking space, such is his reverence for the old chap, so that wasn't going to happen.....
Strong manager or weak manager - the problem at Man Utd. is the ex-Manager.
We were bad at the end of last season without Ronaldo. We were atrocious before Bruno was signed. This season we are bad not only against big teams, We lost to Leicester, Villa, Young Boys, were really bad playing Southampton, Wolves, Villareal, Atalanta...Some of the games Ronaldo did not even play and for the majority of games we played the same formation as last year just with Ronaldo instead of Cavani.Looks plausible, but it doesn't answer the question: If it's only Ronaldo, why is our defence, particularly Maguire and Shaw are so shaky this season? We are leaking goals, and that's what is causing the mayhem.
Wilson seems to blindly hate Ronaldo and does not make any useful point about hiw Ronaldo's signing is related to the current mess in the defense.Looks plausible, but it doesn't answer the question: If it's only Ronaldo, why is our defence, particularly Maguire and Shaw are so shaky this season? We are leaking goals, and that's what is causing the mayhem.
That whole post is just pure speculation you don’t know if Ronaldo has a negative presence in the dressing room or if SAF had anything to do with him joining or keeping Ole on as manager.I realise I am a lone voice in the wilderness, but eventually people might get where I'm coming from. I understand Man Utd fans can't bare to criticise their legendary former Manager and up and down the land the whole who is best, Messi or Ronaldo arguments have been waging for years and I bet a fair few who said Ronaldo are Utd. fans who love that he is now back at the club. But if his presence has caused issues in the dressing room and if his decision to return was influenced by Sir Alex (and I think was) then fans need to accept perhaps putting your old manager on the payroll and on the board and allowing him to still make key decisions, is causing big problems.
Why is SAF supporting OGS, because to not do so when he was so influential in getting Ronaldo to come back, would be unbelievably unfair.
Why is OGS still in post after all these poor results, because nobody is willing to go against Sir Alex Ferguson and decide otherwise.
I've said this before that winning one trophy puts pressure on you to win more. I think Ole as you said is happy in his own little comfort zone, close but no cigar.Wilson seems to blindly hate Ronaldo and does not make any useful point about hiw Ronaldo's signing is related to the current mess in the defense.
But I do think that he is on the right track. Signing Ronaldo, Varane and Sancho was a power move to show that United wants to challenge this season. Ole was not in the position to be really expected to win, so until this season he could safely sit back and counter attack like a typical midtable team. United's setup was not like a typical top team, but it was fine to be the best of the rest and good enough to finish ahead of struggling top 4 contenders.
Those signings, especially Ronaldo, meant that more was expected and he simply has no idea how to coach an elite team. This is what is breaking his neck now, and he has lost the team so much now that even the basics don't work well any more.
In the extremely unlikely event that is true, when any of them have done what he has for our club, or in the game in general they can moan, until then suck it up princess, do your damn jobs and learn from the best.Yes, I understand the laughing emojis, Ronaldo has scored many goals often important ones, but if he weren't there would those key get-out of-jail goals have actually been needed? Maybe not.
This is about whether the manager has lost the players (or not) and who is to blame. When you bring in a veteran on £580,000 per week, no matter what his past record shows, it will have an impact on the other players.
Maybe they don't all love Ronaldo as us fans do especially if they see him impeding their career progression whilst getting 2x or 3x or 4x what they earn...
Ole himself has even said (despite also claiming he's an attacking football manager) that he's gone into a lot of big games previously with a view to stopping the opposition first and foremost and building from there. He said after the win against Liverpool in the FA cup last season that it was the first time United ditched their usual style against Liverpool and were more attacking. Now that he actually has better players and more world class individuals he doesn't seem to know what to do with them or how to fit them in, and the pressure to play those players is enormous. That should't be a criticism of those players, it's a criticism of the manager.I didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
"It’s not about the formation, per se. This has worked for United against City before. Prior to last week’s win at Spurs, the last time they started with a back three in a league game was in March 2020, when they beat City 2-0 with a team strikingly similar to Saturday’s line-up. On that occasion, Brandon Williams started at left wing-back with Luke Shaw replacing Eric Bailly in central defence, Nemanja Matic played instead of Scott McTominay and the front two were Dan James and Anthony Martial (although both Bailly and McTominay came on). The system can work.
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
Yes, I understand the laughing emojis, Ronaldo has scored many goals often important ones, but if he weren't there would those key get-out of-jail goals have actually been needed? Maybe not.
This is about whether the manager has lost the players (or not) and who is to blame. When you bring in a veteran on £580,000 per week, no matter what his past record shows, it will have an impact on the other players.
Maybe they don't all love Ronaldo as us fans do especially if they see him impeding their career progression whilst getting 2x or 3x or 4x what they earn...
This is a brilliant post and perfect description of Solskjaer tenure here . This was the season where it was all suppose to come together for Ole's United no more hiding behind rebuild bullshit but unfortunately it only exposed his incompetence and flaws further .Wilson seems to blindly hate Ronaldo and does not make any useful point about hiw Ronaldo's signing is related to the current mess in the defense.
But I do think that he is on the right track. Signing Ronaldo, Varane and Sancho was a power move to show that United wants to challenge this season. Ole was not in the position to be really expected to win, so until this season he could safely sit back and counter attack like a typical midtable team. United's setup was not like a typical top team, but it was fine to be the best of the rest and good enough to finish ahead of struggling top 4 contenders.
Those signings, especially Ronaldo, meant that more was expected and he simply has no idea how to coach an elite team. This is what is breaking his neck now, and he has lost the team so much now that even the basics don't work well any more.
The players need to take it into their own hands. The boards not going to help them & neither is the fanbase.
He only uses buzzwords about attacking, on the front foot, the United way etc etc because he feel that it was people want to hear. But when he describes his actual approach to especially big games more concretely - it is absolutely analogous to Moyes' infamous "make it difficult" and "aspire to be" comments. How it was overlooked for so long is a mystery to me. In one of resent pressers he said something like "first of all, you have to defend well". Not that it is a bad comment per se, but Moyes would be crucified for the same in 2013 (not that he was not criminally out of his depth either).Ole himself has even said (despite also claiming he's an attacking football manager) that he's gone into a lot of big games previously with a view to stopping the opposition first and foremost and building from there. He said after the win against Liverpool in the FA cup last season that it was the first time United ditched their usual style against Liverpool and were more attacking. Now that he actually has better players and more world class individuals he doesn't seem to know what to do with them or how to fit them in, and the pressure to play those players is enormous. That should't be a criticism of those players, it's a criticism of the manager.
If Ole can only get good results with a very specific way of playing, with players that 'run around a lot' and approaches big games with an underdog mentality then that's not good enough for a United manager. This whole nonsense of blaming Ronaldo is crazy and ignores the fact that the problems have been there since day one of his appointment.
Wilson seems to blindly hate Ronaldo and does not make any useful point about hiw Ronaldo's signing is related to the current mess in the defense.
But I do think that he is on the right track. Signing Ronaldo, Varane and Sancho was a power move to show that United wants to challenge this season. Ole was not in the position to be really expected to win, so until this season he could safely sit back and counter attack like a typical midtable team. United's setup was not like a typical top team, but it was fine to be the best of the rest and good enough to finish ahead of struggling top 4 contenders.
Those signings, especially Ronaldo, meant that more was expected and he simply has no idea how to coach an elite team. This is what is breaking his neck now, and he has lost the team so much now that even the basics don't work well any more.
He only uses buzzwords about attacking, on the front foot, the United way etc etc because he feel that it was people want to hear. But when he describes his actual approach to especially big games more concretely - it is absolutely analogous to Moyes' infamous "make it difficult" and "aspire to be" comments. How it was overlooked for so long is a mystery to me. In one of resent pressers he said something like "first of all, you have to defend well". Not that it is a bad comment per se, but Moyes would be crucified for the same in 2013 (not that he was not criminally out of his depth either).
Question for people who understand the British press -- does this show that the players, led by Ronaldo, are starting to agitate for change? Is there a move to cut Ronaldo off at the knees?I didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
"It’s not about the formation, per se. This has worked for United against City before. Prior to last week’s win at Spurs, the last time they started with a back three in a league game was in March 2020, when they beat City 2-0 with a team strikingly similar to Saturday’s line-up. On that occasion, Brandon Williams started at left wing-back with Luke Shaw replacing Eric Bailly in central defence, Nemanja Matic played instead of Scott McTominay and the front two were Dan James and Anthony Martial (although both Bailly and McTominay came on). The system can work.
But what is different now is context. The back three then felt like a specific plan – United had used it a couple of months earlier in losing at Anfield – rather than a desperate spin of the kaleidoscope, hoping for something to take shape. Nobody can believe this is the way United want to play long-term, because to do so would mean only one of Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Edinson Cavani is ever going to start. It would also mean there is no place at all for poor Jadon Sancho, whom United pursued for 18 months before finally signing amid understandable excitement for £73m.
Last season, United kept five clean sheets in the six league games against City, Chelsea and Liverpool. He’s won four of his nine games against Pep Guardiola. That wasn’t the aspect of his management that used to be doubted. So what has changed? Why have United let in seven goals in two home games in a fortnight against Liverpool and City while being embarrassingly outclassed?
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
To win or to get him sacked? I don't think the players need to do anything to get him sacked. In fact, if they just continue doing what they're doing now, it will happen in due time. If they can all of a sudden turn it on to start winning games, what's stopping them from doing that earlier in the season? I think Ole has lost the majority of the playing squad. I'd include the likes of Bruno, Pogba, Maguire, and even DDG in that with possibility of Ronaldo and Cavani in there as well. Not to mention the ones who don't play or get very limited playing time like Donny, Sancho, Martial, and Lingard. Especially if they wanted out and Ole vetoed the sale or loan move elsewhere.The players need to take it into their own hands. The boards not going to help them & neither is the fanbase.
To win or to get him sacked? I don't think the players need to do anything to get him sacked. In fact, if they just continue doing what they're doing now, it will happen in due time. If they can all of a sudden turn it on to start winning games, what's stopping them from doing that earlier in the season? I think Ole has lost the majority of the playing squad. I'd include the likes of Bruno, Pogba, Maguire, and even DDG in that with possibility of Ronaldo and Cavani in there as well. Not to mention the ones who don't play or get very limited playing time like Donny, Sancho, Martial, and Lingard. Especially if they wanted out and Ole vetoed the sale or loan move elsewhere.
Ole himself has even said (despite also claiming he's an attacking football manager) that he's gone into a lot of big games previously with a view to stopping the opposition first and foremost and building from there. He said after the win against Liverpool in the FA cup last season that it was the first time United ditched their usual style against Liverpool and were more attacking. Now that he actually has better players and more world class individuals he doesn't seem to know what to do with them or how to fit them in, and the pressure to play those players is enormous. That should't be a criticism of those players, it's a criticism of the manager.
If Ole can only get good results with a very specific way of playing, with players that 'run around a lot' and approaches big games with an underdog mentality then that's not good enough for a United manager. This whole nonsense of blaming Ronaldo is crazy and ignores the fact that the problems have been there since day one of his appointment.
Well, it was more or less the basic idea. Obviously you can't do that all the time when the opponent themself is happy sitting deep.That's just lazy backwriting of history to make it easier to explain the present. We did not "sit back and counterattack like a typical midtable team last season", by any stretch of imagination. On the contrary, we typically dominated possession (5th in the league, despite not playing a style heavily emphasising possession) and generally faced teams who played a low block against us. We also scored the second most goals, had the second most goals from inside the box, and were 4th in the number of passes made and shots taken.
Ole himself has even said (despite also claiming he's an attacking football manager) that he's gone into a lot of big games previously with a view to stopping the opposition first and foremost and building from there. He said after the win against Liverpool in the FA cup last season that it was the first time United ditched their usual style against Liverpool and were more attacking. Now that he actually has better players and more world class individuals he doesn't seem to know what to do with them or how to fit them in, and the pressure to play those players is enormous. That should't be a criticism of those players, it's a criticism of the manager.
If Ole can only get good results with a very specific way of playing, with players that 'run around a lot' and approaches big games with an underdog mentality then that's not good enough for a United manager. This whole nonsense of blaming Ronaldo is crazy and ignores the fact that the problems have been there since day one of his appointment.
Well, it was more or less the basic idea. Obviously you can't do that all the time when the opponent themself is happy sitting deep.
United surely had possession, but more because it was forced upon them, and while players like Bruno had great form United were able to create a lot of goals. But it was not because there was a lot of plan behind the attacks. This plan how to attack and beat every team is demanded from a title contender (which this squad should be), and it is simply not there.
Jonathan Wilson is a massive clown, I have sympathy for you if you’re reading his drivelI didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
"It’s not about the formation, per se. This has worked for United against City before. Prior to last week’s win at Spurs, the last time they started with a back three in a league game was in March 2020, when they beat City 2-0 with a team strikingly similar to Saturday’s line-up. On that occasion, Brandon Williams started at left wing-back with Luke Shaw replacing Eric Bailly in central defence, Nemanja Matic played instead of Scott McTominay and the front two were Dan James and Anthony Martial (although both Bailly and McTominay came on). The system can work.
But what is different now is context. The back three then felt like a specific plan – United had used it a couple of months earlier in losing at Anfield – rather than a desperate spin of the kaleidoscope, hoping for something to take shape. Nobody can believe this is the way United want to play long-term, because to do so would mean only one of Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Edinson Cavani is ever going to start. It would also mean there is no place at all for poor Jadon Sancho, whom United pursued for 18 months before finally signing amid understandable excitement for £73m.
Last season, United kept five clean sheets in the six league games against City, Chelsea and Liverpool. He’s won four of his nine games against Pep Guardiola. That wasn’t the aspect of his management that used to be doubted. So what has changed? Why have United let in seven goals in two home games in a fortnight against Liverpool and City while being embarrassingly outclassed?
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
We all know now that this great club deserves and needs, a Top Top manager who brings in Top coaches with him.
funny. But I think that would be the Top Top/Top Top combination that WE ALL DESERVE. Just a suggestion.Would a Top Top Manager not bring in Top Top coaches?
I’m concerned that only a Top Top / Top combination would not bring the Elite Level Patterns of Play that WE ALL DESERVE
I can't remember if it was an actual quote or whether it was just tabloid rumours but there were stories that we were going to play a more attacking brand of football this season with a formation change. As stated, Ole was clear after the Liverpool game in the FA cup last season that it was the first instance of his team playing with more of a view to causing them problems rather than containing and the counter attacking. I did note that as something that I thought would get more attention than it did but no one made much of it.Generally I don't think there's much merit to either the "It's all Ronaldo's fault" or the "It's got nothing whatsoever to do with Ronaldo" schools of thought. I think there's a reasonable case for Ronaldo's arrival bringing a lot of impact in various ways, requiring some serious adjustment, and for the management and the team evidently not being able to make that adjustment. Figuring out why that is the case seems to me likely to be a complex issue, and not one amenable to be explained by bombastic single causes.
Also, people are not above rewriting history to support their advocacy of one side of the argument or the other. Such as arguing that "the problems have been there since day one of his appointment." Very obviously, the way we are performing these days is very different from how we were performing last season. So clearly, these are either not the same problems, or we are having them to a much greater degree than before. Also, it's not like he suddenly and for the first time has had to deal with world class players. We had several of those in the team already, and always have during his tenure.
In 2019/20 we generally did play a quite defensive setup against the best opponents, but I don't think that was the case last season - at least not any more than the opponent did. And in any case, that's just 6 of 38 games. It's not like we were a team founded on strict defensive organisation and built around a group of journeymen last season - we were one of the most attacking teams in the league, whose fortunes revolved principally around the performance of world-class attackers.
So, whatever the problem is, it sure as hell can't be that the manager is unable to deal with star players, or play an attacking style.
Not necessarily. Sometimes a club recommends and some times demand that they keep a certain member of staff, if you follow football. Not that we will recommend anyone here.Would a Top Top Manager not bring in Top Top coaches?
I’m concerned that only a Top Top / Top combination would not bring the Elite Level Patterns of Play that WE ALL DESERVE
We play the same way with and without Ronaldo, he’s the only reason we’re not in the EL already. Midfield is the Achilles he’s of this team, not personnel wise but how it functions. Once a new manager comes in, it will be like night and day after a few weeks.I didn't used to, but I actually have some sympathy for OGS and this article explains my change of view:
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...d-tactics-solskjaer-ronaldo-city-derby-defeat
"It’s not about the formation, per se. This has worked for United against City before. Prior to last week’s win at Spurs, the last time they started with a back three in a league game was in March 2020, when they beat City 2-0 with a team strikingly similar to Saturday’s line-up. On that occasion, Brandon Williams started at left wing-back with Luke Shaw replacing Eric Bailly in central defence, Nemanja Matic played instead of Scott McTominay and the front two were Dan James and Anthony Martial (although both Bailly and McTominay came on). The system can work.
But what is different now is context. The back three then felt like a specific plan – United had used it a couple of months earlier in losing at Anfield – rather than a desperate spin of the kaleidoscope, hoping for something to take shape. Nobody can believe this is the way United want to play long-term, because to do so would mean only one of Marcus Rashford, Mason Greenwood and Edinson Cavani is ever going to start. It would also mean there is no place at all for poor Jadon Sancho, whom United pursued for 18 months before finally signing amid understandable excitement for £73m.
Last season, United kept five clean sheets in the six league games against City, Chelsea and Liverpool. He’s won four of his nine games against Pep Guardiola. That wasn’t the aspect of his management that used to be doubted. So what has changed? Why have United let in seven goals in two home games in a fortnight against Liverpool and City while being embarrassingly outclassed?
The answer is obvious: Cristiano Ronaldo, a player signed at the urging of Sir Alex Ferguson."
We play the same way with and without Ronaldo, he’s the only reason we’re not in the EL already. Midfield is the Achilles he’s of this team, not personnel wise but how it functions. Once a new manager comes in, it will be like night and day after a few weeks.