No, now I want it to happen.
-------------------Ronaldo
Rashford-----Bruno------Sancho
Fred--------McTominay---Van de Beek
-----Bailly---Lindelof----Varane
-----------------De Gea
Full field pressing, high defensive line and pashun.
Could a be a language barrier to be fair and also maybe he never got to grips with public speaking hence the timidness and propensity to talk bollocks?
It is - if you plan your team to defend.
In that case, it's completely a dumb decision, because, as all of you say - Sancho is not a wingback. Or a right back.
If you plan for your team to dominate and attack for 70 minutes, as say Pep's teams play - then NO - it's not stupid.
If we had Pep as the manager we would see a lot of this, and none of you would think it's dumb. Perspective.
Does anybody else get the impression that Ole isn't really the sharpest knife in the drawer? The way he talks in clichés, no real in depth insight or thought.
Then you look at his tactics and it's so basic. Even the way he predictably went 5 at the back and then just ditches it. I think he makes it up as he goes along.
Can't have Ronaldo in a pressing time for starters. Fred can probably defend vs a winger but I doubt Vdb can. Can probably play Shaw in place of Fred, given he's got good passing and link up play to step into midfield when needed.No, now I want it to happen.
-------------------Ronaldo
Rashford-----Bruno------Sancho
Fred--------McTominay---Van de Beek
-----Bailly---Lindelof----Varane
-----------------De Gea
Full field pressing, high defensive line and pashun.
I completely agree with you. Which is exactly why I don't think it will work. We're not a pep team, we're an Ole team, Sancho could probably go to City and play the Cancelo role easily since he has 80% possession, but with the way we play it will be nothing but a disaster, we don't control possession don't move the ball in quick transition and can't defend to save our lives, adding Sancho as a rwb in our setup is a recipe for disaster. Look at our average position in the derby then look at City's and tell me how Sancho being in AWBs position in that setup will be a good thing ?
I don’t know to be fair, either.Maybe. It's just when you follow his logic, it's just so basic and easy to pull apart.
Imagine if you're Pep Guardiola or a top scout and you're analysing what we do or are likely to do when they play us. It probably takes about 5 minutes to come up with a gameplan and you can just read it all like a book.
Dan James of Leeds United?
On paper - could work.
Even in RL it could work.
One thing only - it takes a lot of WORK.
Yep. This was the summer signing for me and have been looking forward to seeing him here and perform but, well, what the feck has happened ?@Judas we have been absolutely obsessed about getting this lad, finally buzzing to actually land him...
for us to hardly play him on the right side at all and now this.
I mean...feck.
Sancho wouldn't be a wing-back in a Pep system - it would be a player taking up an optimal position to probe at the opposition before breaking rank from it to play a pseudo role elsewhere in the attack as the build-up intensified. Pep would never put a player like Sancho on tracks in a strict wing-back role; our staff can't even get a tune out of players in conventional roles, so heaven knows how badly they'd mistreat someone like Sancho having carted him off to the outskirts of the pitch.It is - if you plan your team to defend.
In that case, it's completely a dumb decision, because, as all of you say - Sancho is not a wingback. Or a right back.
If you plan for your team to dominate and attack for 70 minutes, as say Pep's teams play - then NO - it's not stupid.
If we had Pep as the manager we would see a lot of this, and none of you would think it's dumb. Perspective.
I'd say there is more sense in playing Di Maria up front than Sancho at RWB. Both bad decisions, just that one is much worse than the other
So all this planning was for nothing.
I feel that they're happy to experiment with any position other than the obvious broken one, midfield. Why not try maybe other players there? The way we're playing I'd have no issue sending Bailly or Telles, or God forbid VDB.
None of this will resolve the glaring issue anyway, amateurs running the club.
Yep. This was the summer signing for me and have been looking forward to seeing him here and perform but, well, what the feck has happened ?
Possibly worth it's own thread.
We spent years scouting and pursuing one of the most highly rated young attackers in Europe as a £70m+ solution to our longstanding RW problem. And are now reportedly trying to shift him to RWB after a few games. An extremely productive attacking player known for his ability to link play and play between the lines being stuck isolated out wide with more defensive duties as a wing-back, presumably in the hope that he'll just know how to defend when it comes up and be able to do vaguely attacking things when he gets the ball in any situation.
Oh and it would be partly be prompted by the fact that the 50m fullback we bought in an era of technical, offensive fullbacks isn't good technically or offensively.
When we talk about Solskjaer maybe having a legacy in terms of the squad he leaves behind, the complete lack of coherence in this mess should be noted.
How about a variation on a 3-4-1-2
That way, we could line-up something like this...
De Gea
Maguire Varane Shaw
Sancho McTominay Fred Rashford
Bruno
Greenwood Ronaldo
Slightly unorthodox, but I feel it would be worth a go, particularly in home games or games against weaker opposition.
With this formation, we can get Greenwood and Ronaldo in the team as forwards. They can either operate as a traditional front two or they could play as 'split' forwards, with Bruno pushing on to be a false 9.
We would then have a really orthodox, old-school flat four in the middle, with Rashford and Sancho responsible for getting up and down the line.
The midfield two would be deliberately unambitious, mainly in the team to shield the back three, and also cover for the winger on their side when they go on the attack.
Wan Bissaka could probably play in a back threeJeez that's a depressing read and even more so when you realize we've spent a lot on 2 players (Sancho & Wan Bissaka) that we brought in to improve our first 11 and now neither of them work in this formation. Madness.
If it's true, you'd think a horrified Sancho is leaking it himself!Has to be a leak. Last days for Ole if players are leaking this.
Well not that it’ll matter as Joel Glazer doesn’t know his arse from his elbow.Has to be a leak. Last days for Ole if players are leaking this.
I highly doubt it. A back 3 means some ball playing CBs at least. If you look at all the teams using this formation, the 2 wide CBs are comfortable on the ball and AWB is...Wan Bissaka could probably play in a back three
Sancho wouldn't be a wing-back in a Pep system - it would be a player taking up an optimal position to probe at the opposition before breaking rank from it to play a pseudo role elsewhere in the attack as the build-up intensified. Pep would never put a player like Sancho on tracks in a strict wing-back role; our staff can't even get a tune out of players in conventional roles, so heaven knows how badly they'd mistreat someone like Sancho having carted him off to the outskirts of the pitch.
He isn't fast, he isn't strong, he doesn't have the stamina nor the defensive awareness to play as a wing-back, and any side in the PL will rightfully target, and spit-roast him if we're stupid enough to field him in the role, which would do wonders for his confidence in what is turning out to be a horror move under a manager who has no idea how to use him and will have then further compounded it with this masterstroke.
No idea mate. I'm at a complete loss as to why he hasn't played more. Crazy.
I'm not convinced, you're losing his best attribute which is his 1v1 defending. He's heading ability has never stood out to me and certainly one of his biggest weaknesses is his position which could be very costly as a center back, even in a three.Wan Bissaka could probably play in a back three
If it's true, you'd think a horrified Sancho is leaking it himself!
Think Sancho is a system player. When played in a specific system with a lot of moving parts — he’ll look sensational as he did for Dortmund.No idea mate. I'm at a complete loss as to why he hasn't played more. Crazy.
It’s almost certainly Sancho’s camp. No way anyone in a right mind would leak this in hope that it’s seen as some sort of a positive.If it's true, you'd think a horrified Sancho is leaking it himself!
Wan Bissaka could probably play in a back three
Pretty obvious, we’ve been struggling in every game so Ole has just reverted to what worked last season, only with Ronaldo, because he can’t drop Ronaldo. Sancho will only play if he starts winning games for us, which is a tall ask considering how dysfunctional we are now.
When we were first 'linked' with Conte I actually thought I can see Jesse playing as a rwb in a Conte system. Sancho though, I just can't see it being anything other than a disaster.Agree.
There are more suited players even in our team to play that position.
I'm just commenting on the article, and giving it a opposite (positive?) approach.
Well, to be fair, if used correctly, he doesn't have to be fast or strong, he just needs to be wide.
Nah he couldn’t. He’s awful positionally.Wan Bissaka could probably play in a back three