Longlivekeano
Full Member
Pointless comparison
park is a wide midfielder while Son is a wide forward / support striker. Nakata was a central midfielder.
But if you want to compare in terms of importance to their respective clubs- son is undoubtedly more important to Spurs vis-a-vis park to United or nakata to Perugia/Roma
the only parallels are three are considered pivotal to their countries’ fortunes at the World Cup/Asian Cup
park is a wide midfielder while Son is a wide forward / support striker. Nakata was a central midfielder.
But if you want to compare in terms of importance to their respective clubs- son is undoubtedly more important to Spurs vis-a-vis park to United or nakata to Perugia/Roma
the only parallels are three are considered pivotal to their countries’ fortunes at the World Cup/Asian Cup