Deery
Dreary
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
- Messages
- 18,590
I don’t want suffice I want spectacular, people talk about Carrick like he was absolutely amazing but it was Scholes that was the amazing one.No need for peak Scholes, Carrick would suffice
I don’t want suffice I want spectacular, people talk about Carrick like he was absolutely amazing but it was Scholes that was the amazing one.No need for peak Scholes, Carrick would suffice
Scholes wasn't specially spectacular (apart from his long range goals). He was very consistent at his peak that's for sure.I don’t want suffice I want spectacular, people talk about Carrick like he was absolutely amazing but it was Scholes that was the amazing one.
That might be the worst take I’ve ever seen on here.Scholes wasn't specially spectacular (apart from his long range goals). He was very consistent at his peak that's for sure.
When I hear spectacular, I think of Zidane, Ronaldinho, Neymar. Scholes is a totally different player in terms of styles while having been one of the best players of his generation. HTHThat might be the worst take I’ve ever seen on here.
It is. If a team in general look sloppy (as opposed to the odd individual) it's the manager's fault for not getting the individuals/collective to perform adequately or signing the right players to ensure itAnyone noticed how often we do this now?
It’s not a coaching issue so please leave any Ole shit at the door. I’ve just been so confused how often a pass is played slightly behind or slightly in front of a player. We’ve ruined so much momentum by accidentally playing a ball behind someone and forcing them backwards, or too far ahead causing the runner to commit a foul or commit too high up.
I think it’s so important in games to have the passing right so the runner doesn’t have to break stride. It helps sustain attacks and prevents us playing our way backwards into trouble so often. If a pass to Shaw is too quick and requires him to stretch for it and take a couple touches to get under control then it’s too late. The opposition will have reset and all he can do is go backwards.
Then you’ve got some awful first touches from players. This is stuff that is down to their abilities. I know confidence can play a part but at the very least you would expect the basics to not be so consistently off.
Focus, composure etc these are all things a manager has to ensure his team has. It's a like thread about a problem which doesn't want to focus on how to fix it.Agree with the OP it isn’t coaching, it’s players not concentrating, not being on it and just being too casual. They are all at it, some times it’s a 5 yard pass and they can’t complete it
I think its down to three issues
a- Ole hates ball possession. His strategy is to move the ball forward from defense to attack as quickly as possible. In today's football that's a tough thing even with a well drilled side made up of top players who know each other inside out. That's because modern sides tend to flood their own half with players which means that there's not much space to operate in.
b- McFred are not good enough. At best they are squad player level B2B players. They lack the discipline and positioning to play in a DM role and their distribution of the ball is horrendous. That disrupts the flow of the game as the rest of the team are constantly concerned that they will soon have to chase the ball thanks to a feck up of those two.
c- Bruno is our main playmaker in CM and yet he's operating more as a second striker. That means that our team lacks a playmaker that is able to pass the ball into the correct channels. Add the quick tempo Ole wants to the mix and the issue become worse
Anyone noticed how often we do this now?
It’s not a coaching issue so please leave any Ole shit at the door. I’ve just been so confused how often a pass is played slightly behind or slightly in front of a player. We’ve ruined so much momentum by accidentally playing a ball behind someone and forcing them backwards, or too far ahead causing the runner to commit a foul or commit too high up.
I think it’s so important in games to have the passing right so the runner doesn’t have to break stride. It helps sustain attacks and prevents us playing our way backwards into trouble so often. If a pass to Shaw is too quick and requires him to stretch for it and take a couple touches to get under control then it’s too late. The opposition will have reset and all he can do is go backwards.
Then you’ve got some awful first touches from players. This is stuff that is down to their abilities. I know confidence can play a part but at the very least you would expect the basics to not be so consistently off.
I don't think, the possession stat is an indicator of what Ole hates and what not. Just because teams surrender the ball to us because they know they can get something out of the game with setting up organized defenses, don't give spaces and wait for counters doesn't mean, WE want to play possession. What do you expect us to do, stay deep, trying to bait the opponent to having a go at us? Opponents would celebrate that decision because that makes the route to a 1-point 0:0 even more likelier.Ole hates possession
We had 70 percent against Everton, btw.
Your takes really are among the most stupid ones on the Caf. I’ll take the infraction to finally state that.
a- I don't think, Ole hates possession but there are some indicators, that he doesn't give it the same meaning as other managers do. Which in itself wouldn't be a problem but a top club simply cannot rely on transitions only. I mean, I guess we could but then we have to emphasize creating goals using crosses and set pieces way way more than we currently do. Possession in the modern is a way of attacking and defending - as a top club you have to deal with it, if you want or not.I think its down to three issues
a- Ole hates ball possession. His strategy is to move the ball forward from defense to attack as quickly as possible. In today's football that's a tough thing even with a well drilled side made up of top players who know each other inside out. That's because modern sides tend to flood their own half with players which means that there's not much space to operate in.
b- McFred are not good enough. At best they are squad player level B2B players. They lack the discipline and positioning to play in a DM role and their distribution of the ball is horrendous. That disrupts the flow of the game as the rest of the team are constantly concerned that they will soon have to chase the ball thanks to a feck up of those two.
c- Bruno is our main playmaker in CM and yet he's operating more as a second striker. That means that our team lacks a playmaker that is able to pass the ball into the correct channels. Add the quick tempo Ole wants to the mix and the issue become worse
I don't think one player will change us as team, don't you think? Obviously a player of Scholes quality would suit us pretty well, it isn't just putting the best individuals together on the pitch. Pogba is also quite good playing passes of all ranges, the problems persist nonetheless.I don’t want suffice I want spectacular, people talk about Carrick like he was absolutely amazing but it was Scholes that was the amazing one.
It is. If a team in general look sloppy (as opposed to the odd individual) it's the manager's fault for not getting the individuals/collective to perform adequately or signing the right players to ensure it
Please see my previous responses.
A team that's excellently coached makes football look simple and one that isn't makes it look difficulty. Whether it's the system elevating players or dragging dragging down, confidence, concentration or the right type of players, these are all things the manager has to put right. 4th season into Ole's time here and you're wondering why short passes are always a little off. Says it all, really.fecks sake read the damn thread. I’m talking about basic passes. It’s not a coaches job to show a footballer the right way to pass the ball 5 yards.
I think the right player would change us as a team, yes. No difference to getting a world class striker, a world class midfielder can change a team yes. The right one like a Scholes will even lift the levels in training, we’ve heard that before from players.I don't think one player will change us as team, don't you think? Obviously a player of Scholes quality would suit us pretty well, it isn't just putting the best individuals together on the pitch. Pogba is also quite good playing passes of all ranges, the problems persist nonetheless.
Ole hates possession
We had 70 percent against Everton, btw.
Your takes really are among the most stupid ones on the Caf. I’ll take the infraction to finally state that.
a- I don't think, Ole hates possession but there are some indicators, that he doesn't give it the same meaning as other managers do. Which in itself wouldn't be a problem but a top club simply cannot rely on transitions only. I mean, I guess we could but then we have to emphasize creating goals using crosses and set pieces way way more than we currently do. Possession in the modern is a way of attacking and defending - as a top club you have to deal with it, if you want or not.
b- Our issues aren't just connected to personnel. They are apparent also when other players are employed in the midfield area. Plus have a look at Freds profile at fbref, he ranks more than well compared to other midfielders in terms of progressive passes. It isn't just their missing qualities, it is them being asked to play in an environment, that doesn't cater to their capabilities.
c- True, even though in the first half against Everton, I thought that Bruno has involved a bit more. But yes - he needs to be a midfield player first and has to learn to recognize the spots when to go as an attacker - even if that means his output takes a little hit, the team would benefit from it.
I wouldn't say looking at your examples is a side quest. It helps to narrow down and contain the problem, or at least provide some context.Look I understand what you mean and your statements are correct, but when other people use Citys players and their "technical superiority" to explain, why we can't string a few passes together, then I think, it is only logical to also have a look below us. But - for what its worth - fine, don't look at Brighton for passing, just remember LVG days of United. How long did it take us to be very dominantly possession wise? A few weeks? Players who weren't used to that style, players like Smalling, Fellaini etc.
Lets not get distracted by the pro's and con's of some sidequests like how good of an example Brighton is. It is apparent that we lack something in passing. We have the same things happening when it is Dalot playing for AWB - exactly the same. It isn't -just- a few players who lack technical skills - it is the whole team who doesn't seem to maximize their potential passing wise.
When they play well it's individual brilliance.
When they play badly it's poor coaching.
Caf coaches have spoken.
I don't think, the possession stat is an indicator of what Ole hates and what not. Just because teams surrender the ball to us because they know they can get something out of the game with setting up organized defenses, don't give spaces and wait for counters doesn't mean, WE want to play possession. What do you expect us to do, stay deep, trying to bait the opponent to having a go at us? Opponents would celebrate that decision because that makes the route to a 1-point 0:0 even more likelier.
Just look at what happens when Ronaldo comes on against Everton, latest when Pogba comes on as well - we surrender the midfield completely and only go for long balls. That is the way we "try" to materialize pressure.
I think, your take in this instance is a bit naive - our opponents have intelligent people just as we do. Some stats aren't just affected by our own gameplan but also from the opponents. Nobody would describe us as having developed from a counter attacking outfit to an possession based outfit in Oles time at the club - no we are still heavily transition based (which in itself isn't a bad thing per se) but our opponents don't play right into our cards anymore. So we have to have possession which we aren't great in converting into goalchance creation.
a- I don't think, Ole hates possession but there are some indicators, that he doesn't give it the same meaning as other managers do. Which in itself wouldn't be a problem but a top club simply cannot rely on transitions only. I mean, I guess we could but then we have to emphasize creating goals using crosses and set pieces way way more than we currently do. Possession in the modern is a way of attacking and defending - as a top club you have to deal with it, if you want or not.
b- Our issues aren't just connected to personnel. They are apparent also when other players are employed in the midfield area. Plus have a look at Freds profile at fbref, he ranks more than well compared to other midfielders in terms of progressive passes. It isn't just their missing qualities, it is them being asked to play in an environment, that doesn't cater to their capabilities.
c- True, even though in the first half against Everton, I thought that Bruno has involved a bit more. But yes - he needs to be a midfield player first and has to learn to recognize the spots when to go as an attacker - even if that means his output takes a little hit, the team would benefit from it.
I don't think one player will change us as team, don't you think? Obviously a player of Scholes quality would suit us pretty well, it isn't just putting the best individuals together on the pitch. Pogba is also quite good playing passes of all ranges, the problems persist nonetheless.
you do notice that our game is influenced by a third factor ie our opposition?. Rafa is known for playing a low block and then hit with quick counters. He can't care less of losing ball possession against us
I believe that @NZT-One had lectured you on the subject far better then I could possibly do.
Anyone noticed how often we do this now?
We've got a team of average passers.
Compare any of them to Mata or Matic for example, their passing is crisp and sharp to feet. Pogba and Bruno can make those hollywood balls but their general passing to feet in limited space is 'okay', nothing more.
McFred is a huge problem and Ole needs to have the humility to back down on this point, and the tactical nous to make adaption to accommodate a different combination.
AWB isn't a problem. His ability on the ball is the least of our concerns at present. And we need his defensive ability on the right as Greenwood is shocking defensively.
That's actually false.
Bruno actually has good passing, so does Pogba. I have seen every player, KDB, Salah misplace passes.
The problem is our manager. Bruno has been told to attempt those killer passes, which is why he does it.
A top manager when players can't carry out simple passes will call them out once, twice and then drop them.
United have a manager who believes that workrate is more important than passing in midfield, which is the issue we have at the moment.
Greenwood has been like that, nothing has changed, which is why we bought a RW but the clueless manager doesn't know how to use the players.
The OP has explained around 20 times by now that they are not talking about all the passing, which they have already admitted is problematic due to coaching, but literally the most simple passes with players open around them in 5-10 yards radius without under any pressure and still messing it up. Why should footballers with international caps, who have played under multiple managers need to be taught how to do the most basic fundamental things correctly? What the hell are they getting all the money for if can't bring even the most basic technique to the team? If a player like Fred needs a coach to teach him not to pass the ball straight to the opposition, when he is not attempting a difficult through ball, not under any pressure and has multiple options to pass to around him in space and STILL cannot put the correct weight and angle on it - he should not be anywhere near a team playing at the topmost tier in their pyramid.A team that's excellently coached makes football look simple and one that isn't makes it look difficulty. Whether it's the system elevating players or dragging dragging down, confidence, concentration or the right type of players, these are all things the manager has to put right. 4th season into Ole's time here and you're wondering why short passes are always a little off. Says it all, really.
It would be really funny if the board asked Ole at the end of this season why we're still trophyless and he reels off names of players whose passes are always underhit/overhit/infront or behind as if that's not really his problem to solve.
The OP has explained around 20 times by now that they are not talking about all the passing, which they have already admitted is problematic due to coaching, but literally the most simple passes with players open around them in 5-10 yards radius without under any pressure and still messing it up. Why should footballers with international caps, who have played under multiple managers need to be taught how to do the most basic fundamental things correctly? What the hell are they getting all the money for if can't bring even the most basic technique to the team? If a player like Fred needs a coach to teach him not to pass the ball straight to the opposition, when he is not attempting a difficult through ball, not under any pressure and has multiple options to pass to around him in space and STILL cannot put the correct weight and angle on it - he should not be anywhere near a team playing at the topmost tier in their pyramid.
It's like me hiring a guy with 15 years of experience and then having to teach them how to do a SUM in excel. There are a lot of things obviously that can be made easier by better tactics and the OP has addressed that multiple times but any players who need a particular system to not make kindergarden errors should not be anywhere near the team. Either way the idea of the thread was to address some other issues in our gameplay apart from what has already been repeated a million times in 50 other threads but the caf is so hopelessly tunnel-visioned right now that no matter what they are not capable of looking at anything else but one thing and one thing only.
Ok right.
So my take on it is false, but we have a clueless manager and who doesn't know how to use players and he finished 2nd in the league last year. Ye, sure - I think one of us had the more reasoned opinion.
I agree with the bolded part, as I stated in the my original post.
Bruno and Pogba are good passers I agree, I still think Mata and Matic have better technique - not that either should be played. I was literally comparing our best passers of the ball who are starters, to two players in the squad who are easily better.
If the majority of our players are making the same mistakes, then how can you look any further than the leadership? What’s the alternative; that all of our expensive international players can’t actually pass a football?Thank you for actually listening and focusing on what I was trying to say and not dragging in multiple other unrelated aspects.