onemanarmy
Full Member
But it's only working in a reactive sense. The truth is that it's no bigger, or smaller a priority than any other. There's that much rubbish and scope for improvement in this team that you could quite literally start anywhere. You could argue that a different keeper might be more aggressive in his positioning. Therefore the team could play higher up the pitch, forcing errors closer to the oppositions goal. Perhaps a new keeper would be more comfortable in possession, allowing us to be more progressive and effective in beating the press. You can make a case for any position to be the first or last to be fixed.
We have 10 players leaving. We'll end up with 1 striker and almost no midfield. We have no decent fullbacks. We have no right winger. At least we have a very decent keeper, so I can't understand why it should be the first thing to be fixed.