antsmithmk
Hates women.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 1,676
Yep. And in Matic a player so immobile we have effectively 1.25 central midfielders. That are no one seems able to do the basics.It's a traditional 4-4-2 with the wingers to boot.
Yep. And in Matic a player so immobile we have effectively 1.25 central midfielders. That are no one seems able to do the basics.It's a traditional 4-4-2 with the wingers to boot.
Jamie Redknapp thinks he's making up systems
I highly doubt it, maybe we could see a better version of last night's dross. We know that the players are weak mentally but I think the manager is a bit confused and has his hands tied regarding who he can drop. Sancho and Greenwood aren't the No. 10s you play in a 4-2-2-2, they arent that strong on the ball and close to useless off it so it was suicide from the manager, we were lucky to only lose by one goal.I agree 100%. Since we have a bit of time till the Villa game, will we see a new approach ?
It's shit . Why is Cavani deep? His touch is too loose for that. I want him in the box or in South America.
We have 2 of the best poachers in football. Why don't we play for control so we can knock it around the box to get our strikers on the end of things?
IndeedIn my opinion, asking Ronaldo/Cavani to do anything more than move into/around the box is pretty bad idea.
Asking both of them to do it at the same time is baffling.
On the other hand, because we have both Ronaldo and Cavani on the pitch from the start, we use Elanga to save our asses, which is even more funny.
I’m surprised he’s not using Lingard in this 4-2-2-2.
On paper this looks good,
Back 4
Mctomminy Fred
Pogba Lingard
Bruno Cavani
But on the pitch it would probably be a shambles.
the 4222 is not the issue but RR using the wrong players for this system. McTominay apart from the Burnley game has been terrible. Matic slow and cannot move. None of our midfield players including Bruno can hold the ball. None apart from Pogba can pass. Neither Greenwood no Sancho can play in those positions. Maybe he should take a gamble and play either Dalot, Telles or Shaw in midfield instead of McTominay. Yes they have played as wingbacks but at least they are more quicker and better passers of the ball than McTominay. Or just play two upfront and 4 midfield players.
I’m surprised he’s not using Lingard in this 4-2-2-2.
On paper this looks good,
Back 4
Mctomminy Fred
Pogba Lingard
Bruno Cavani
But on the pitch it would probably be a shambles.
Exactly this. Thats what defies explanation. 4-2-2-2 firstly needs the high press which we cant/wont do and then we need players in the proper positions. I agree that the midfield is sht but its even harder for them if the 10's cant keep hold of the ball and its even harder for the attackers if the 10's cant thread balls through to them. It also makes it harder when your 9's arnt mobile and dont hold onto the ball. Every facet of a 4-2-2-2 is not be implemented.
DVB and Pogba look like nailed on ideal number 10's in this system and Lingard. Why are all 3 out the door? Martial looks a better 9 as well. Basically all the players that look suited to this system are not wanted or want out. We arnt even playing anything like a 4-2-2-2. Its a 4-4-2. If we played 4-2-2-2 properly we wouldn't get overrun in midfield because the 10's would make up the numbers and it would basically be 4 in midfield. Makes absolutely no sense. Ralf cant be that stupid - can he?
I can only assume Ralf feels he needs to pick certain players either because he is being told to or he thinks that if he benches them that that would cause so many problems in the dressing room its not worth it.
"the space is on the outside" Bruno Lage picks apart Man Utd's tactics in their loss to Wolves.
It’s 4-4-2 isn’t it? You can get as hipster as you like calling it 4-2-2-2 …
"the space is on the outside" Bruno Lage picks apart Man Utd's tactics in their loss to Wolves.
"the space is on the outside" Bruno Lage picks apart Man Utd's tactics in their loss to Wolves.
There are no wingers in a 4222. Yes, the system (like quite a few others these days) require Fullbacks to provide width in attack and defense. Thats why you need to have these energetic types on that position and why switching to wingbacks is a thing to circumvent certain issues. We don't really have that fullbacks hence the level of width. It has nothing to do with the formation we play, when we played 4231, the "so called wingers" where strikers just as well, trying to drift inside. That is more or less exactly the same in the 4222.Its more 424 as the wingers are so far up the pitch.
There are no wingers in a 4222. Yes, the system (like quite a few others these days) require Fullbacks to provide width in attack and defense. Thats why you need to have these energetic types on that position and why switching to wingbacks is a thing to circumvent certain issues. We don't really have that fullbacks hence the level of width. It has nothing to do with the formation we play, when we played 4231, the "so called wingers" where strikers just as well, trying to drift inside. That is more or less exactly the same in the 4222.
The issue, as somebody said already, is the dissection between attack, midfield and defense. It seems like there is an understanding that every "department" is working for itself. That is the issue and has been under Ole just as well. Just look at Wolves yesterday, they bossed the midfield even though they had Moutinho and Neves there. Hardly energetic but they have been supported admirably by their wingbacks and offensive players. That is where we have to get.
Based on understat, Wolves created an xG of 0.84 so hardly have we been under the cosh. You are right, opposition will always try to exploit imbalances based on formations. But there is no perfect one that has no downsides. I agree, RR should have changed our setup yesterday when he saw that our numerical advantage in defense did us no favour at all because Wolves were playing really well as a team supporting each other.Every opposition manager will look at us playing 4222 or this weird dysfunctional 4222/424 we played last night and rightly conclude that you only need to attack us with width. It's not rocket science, there's a reason very few teams use this formation. I'm sure given a year or two and a load of signings it could eventually work. But ralf doesn't have that long.
Based on understat, Wolves created an xG of 0.84 so hardly have we been under the cosh. You are right, opposition will always try to exploit imbalances based on formations. But there is no perfect one that has no downsides. I agree, RR should have changed our setup yesterday when he saw that our numerical advantage in defense did us no favour at all because Wolves were playing really well as a team supporting each other.
I understand what you mean but I don't really get it. A - City employed that tactic only a few years ago when D. Silva was still there. B - what we have seen yesterday, could have easily been a game from last season, a year ago, 6 weeks ago. The way Ole set us up, 4231, Bruno was often dragged to striker positions making him more a striker than an actual midfielder. The "wingers" were rarely staying wide, Rashford, Greenwood, Sancho, Pogba whoever played there was dragged inside. So if you have a midfielder who plays like a striker and two winger, who play like outside forwards, what is so entirely different to 4222? I'll give you that Rashford and Greenwood are even more unsuited to that position than to the outside forwards in a 4231 but that isn't why we looked so bad yesterday. And it isn't why we looked so bad against Newcastle too.Of course not but some are less perfect than others and there's a reason very few teams, especially top teams use 4222.
I understand what you mean but I don't really get it. A - City employed that tactic only a few years ago when D. Silva was still there. B - what we have seen yesterday, could have easily been a game from last season, a year ago, 6 weeks ago. The way Ole set us up, 4231, Bruno was often dragged to striker positions making him more a striker than an actual midfielder. The "wingers" were rarely staying wide, Rashford, Greenwood, Sancho, Pogba whoever played there was dragged inside. So if you have a midfielder who plays like a striker and two winger, who play like outside forwards, what is so entirely different to 4222? I'll give you that Rashford and Greenwood are even more unsuited to that position than to the outside forwards in a 4231 but that isn't why we looked so bad yesterday. And it isn't why we looked so bad against Newcastle too.
Maybe I just didn't get your point, why do you think, that the formation is such a key thing in the struggles these days?
Correct. I’m fed up reading any sort of justification of playing this mythical 4-2-2-2. The only way we can play any sort of 2 in central midfield is to buy 2 new central midfielders and even then with the lack of mobility they would struggle.4-4-2 or 4-2-2-2 is so outdated
Any good manager just sticks 3 - midfielders against us and they control the game
It’s the this Manager has not seen us play for the last year or so
I have no faith in him or his system whatsoever
It’s 4-4-2 isn’t it? You can get as hipster as you like calling it 4-2-2-2 …
It's a traditional 4-4-2 with the wingers to boot.