Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 55,232
Actually wanted us to lose today. Yes, really. This merely delays the inevitable. Ole out.
Cracking 6th post...8 years on from joining
Actually wanted us to lose today. Yes, really. This merely delays the inevitable. Ole out.
I think City will play in our hands again . It helps that they have no strikers.
A 3-4-1-2 is essentially a 3-4-3 but the 3 just being a different shape. The actual formation of it doesn't matter all that much. Bruno definitely wasn't on par with Fred and McTominay in terms of defensive responsibility or how deep they played. He was far closed to the front 2, making it an attacking 3. He played as a 10 - just behind 2 strikers. It wasn't a midfield 3 where the midfield is a distance away from the attackers - it was pretty clear IMO that if you look at it in groups, Bruno was part of the attacking group as he always is. The fullbacks definitely played more like wing backs, or at least yeah like they usually do but we were more balanced as it just doesn't work in a 4-2-3-1 formation.There was no 3-4-3 today. Where have you seen that? Against the ball it was sometimes a 6-3-1 with McTom joining the backline and Cavani joining the midfield. Obviously the players have to find some sort of groove in that new formation and obviously no formations is defensive or offensive just because but lets not go overboard today. The players played just like they always do just that we have a third CB in there. The fullbacks played like fullbacks, not like Wingbacks or LM/RM. McTom was deployed a bit behind Fred and Bruno most of the time too.
3-4-3...
and we can hope, with our strikers, to score from half a chanceYep. With 5 defenders we'll definitely stop their zero strikers.
If we want to start this way, we can also say it was a 5-3-1... So I know what you mean but commonly a 3-4-3 is known for having 2 inside forwards (wingers) outside of a real striker or potentially a false-9. A 3-4-1-2 has a traditional offensive playmaker and two "classic" strikers. Which was what we have seen today. Therefor I don't think, calling it a 3-4-3 is correct.A 3-4-1-2 is essentially a 3-4-3 but the 3 just being a different shape. The actual formation of it doesn't matter all that much. Bruno definitely wasn't on par with Fred and McTominay in terms of defensive responsibility or how deep they played. He was far closed to the front 2, making it an attacking 3. He played as a 10 - just behind 2 strikers. It wasn't a midfield 3 where the midfield is a distance away from the attackers - it was pretty clear IMO that if you look at it in groups, Bruno was part of the attacking group as he always is. The fullbacks definitely played more like wing backs, or at least yeah like they usually do but we were more balanced as it just doesn't work in a 4-2-3-1 formation.
Really happy with everything I saw today. Great tactics (even though I doubted them), excellent commitment from players, and we played as a team.
I was ole doubt, but he’s earned more time. Let’s stay united.
Voted for him I thought he was immense
One genuine question because I am still puzzled how well the ratings for the players are in general compared to my own ratings: how do you rate the player? Are you comparing, in this case McTominays performance with a) his recent performances and other contexts or b) with overall quality? So more relative in terms of other performances of the same player or more absolute?Voted for him I thought he was immense
Fred played well ? He lost possession about 20 times
McTominay was man of the match
That was probably mctom. You can't honestly believe fred had a good game? He was dispossessed numerous times esp in the second half which lead to impotent spurs attacks. He was weak and flimsy on the ball. Nothing in his performance surprised me. Runs around a lot but that's not good enough.I can't believe we watched the same game. I bet he made most tackles, had most touches and ran most distance.
That was probably mctom. You can't honestly believe fred had a good game? He was dispossessed numerous times esp in the second half which lead to impotent spurs attacks. He was weak and flimsy on the ball. Nothing in his performance surprised me. Runs around a lot but that's not good enough.
Fred is woeful. And will be replaced once we get to the next transfer window or next summer. We need 2 new midfielders. Pogba needs to go too. Then we are capable of challenging on all fronts.Apart from his shot from long distance Fred was a liability. We didn’t get punished for his poor play so it’s easily overlooked.
Go and support Liverpool then.Over stacking the defence and staying ultra compact against a team that has fewer goals than Mo Salah. It’s not that impressive to be honest. If this works against City I will be very surprised.
Go and support Liverpool then.
Spuds away and taking all 3 points after last weekend and all the negative media. One of the most prolific strikers contained (had basically 3 or 4 touches in the 2nd half) Where do you work, a funeral parlor?
Just enjoy the win ffs
Picking Maguire and two touch Fred was either stupid or Ole has alzheimer's.
Spurs are awful which means you would expect to beat them and thankfully we did.
Cavani just glides like he could lead the 300.
Disappointed that Donny didn't come on for Fred .
I wonder what game he watched
What does Donny need to do to get a game?
He's being realistic, that's the worst Spurs performance in years. United were okay today, Ronaldo was exceptional. Did you just wake up from a coma, have you seen us this season. Negative media nothing, we were beat 5.0 by Liverpool at Old Trafford only a few days ago, awful performances this season. Get your head out of your ass and acknowledge this manager ain't bringing us back to the top.Go and support Liverpool then.
Spuds away and taking all 3 points after last weekend and all the negative media. One of the most prolific strikers contained (had basically 3 or 4 touches in the 2nd half) Where do you work, a funeral parlor?
Just enjoy the win ffs
Go and support Liverpool then.
Spuds away and taking all 3 points after last weekend and all the negative media. One of the most prolific strikers contained (had basically 3 or 4 touches in the 2nd half) Where do you work, a funeral parlor?
Just enjoy the win ffs
Absolutely, we should have really opened up and gone for it. A front line of Ronnie, Cavani, Sancho, Rashford and Greenwood would have shut those naysayers up. Midfields are overrated.Over stacking the defence and staying ultra compact against a team that has fewer goals than Mo Salah. It’s not that impressive to be honest. If this works against City I will be very surprised.
Over stacking the defence and staying ultra compact against a team that has fewer goals than Mo Salah. It’s not that impressive to be honest. If this works against City I will be very surprised.
Stuart Attwell