- Joined
- Dec 9, 2020
- Messages
- 915
Rashford wasn't offside, not that he intended to anyway. It's the camera's angle. It made him look like he will be offside but Rashford is clearly trying to slow down to stay parallel to Sancho.
It’s been covered here he actually wasn’t offside, I thought he was off too.
he was in the Cayman Islands.Was he offshore though?
Anybody who knows anything about football knows stats without context is incredibly lazy and the person citing them are usually lacking in knowledge of the game.
Who cares about 24 shots when 21/22 of them were uneventful? Possession around half way line and outside the box also means feck all.
We were rarely stressed at the back. Battered, most certainly not.
Another stat monkey who doesn’t know how to watch football I’m guessing
Unbelievable Jeff.
Rashford wasn't offside, not that he intended to anyway. It's the camera's angle. It made him look like he will be offside but Rashford is clearly trying to slow down to stay parallel to Sancho.
He’s been offshore for a while nowHe could have been offshore for sure.
He wasn't offside though.
Oh yes I just rewatched the video. Rashford was offside at a few certain points. Guess he was just too fast like a young CR7!Rashford’s foot was over the white line and the ball wasn’t. He was off at that point at least.
Yes we did.
Was he offshore though?
What the hell is offshore in football!? Never heard the word used in sports unless it's the players bank accounts.
It's basically off(side) for sure so no need for VAR. You live and learn.
Just not getting beat is a rung up from where we were. I did say we were mostly terrible.How can we be climbing out of it? We were pathetically defensive, no attacking intent at all. Lucky they made a mistake for us to score because we couldn't string 2 passes together.
Anthony Taylor