lem8sh
New Member
Nani would be a phenomenal player if he had a half decent football brain.
This This This This
Nani would be a phenomenal player if he had a half decent football brain.
I'm not comparing them, it was an example.
Summit, you're talking as if his goal was basically just a dink over the keeper, which is bullshit to the extreme. You just described the full goal there anyway (although still underrating it), kinda proving my point.
For the record, I don't really think Rooney is capable of the run Nani did when he got the ball off Anderson, to actually get in that position.
Nani would be a phenomenal player if he had a half decent football brain.
Nani gives up possession too often/easily for Barcelona to be interested.
He'd be mint at Madrid though, and they do like taking our best players when SAF wants rid.
Ergo we don't have anyone in the squad who can score a goal like that.
Let's leave it at that mate
He'd be mint at Madrid though, and they do like taking our best players when SAF wants rid.
He'd be mint at Madrid though, and they do like taking our best players when SAF wants rid.
He'd be mint here if he grew a brain, concentrated on playing football and earned a new contract on merit.
Best players when SAF wants rid? Like?
He'd be mint here if he grew a brain and concentrated on playing football and earned a new contract on merit.
Best players when SAF wants rid? Like?
I can only think of Beckham and RVP that may fit that bill
I know we tend to over analyse everything in football today but did anyone else think his celebration was a bit sulky? Kind of similar to Tevez in his last season with us.
The grow a brain thing is awfully harsh Sults, he may not be a Scholes or Rooney but he's certainly not a Sturridge or Robben either.
And we've no clue about the contract situation, or whose fault it is.
He'd be mint here if he grew a brain, concentrated on playing football and earned a new contract on merit.
I know we tend to over analyse everything in football today but did anyone else think his celebration was a bit sulky? Kind of similar to Tevez in his last season with us.
His inconsistency stems from childishly giving away ball and choosing the wrong options - It's certainly not lack of footballing talent, which we all know has never been in doubt.
The grow a brain thing is awfully harsh Sults, he may not be a Scholes or Rooney but he's certainly not a Sturridge or Robben either.
And we've no clue about the contract situation, or whose fault it is.
Beckham and RVN.
Ah, the good old "he doesn't have a brain" thing again. What a lot of shit, his statistics in recent seasons speak otherwise, and people ALWAYS have to pick up on him giving the ball away, and when he does that's their decision made on him. Last night's goal was fecking brilliant, if someone didn't have a footballing brain then there is no chance that would have happened. Give and go with Anderson in amongst a crowd of players on the edge of the Chelsea box then a dink over one of the best keepers in the world. That's outstanding, and shows that he does have quite a brilliant footballing brain at times.
Not having Beckham as the best player in that team back then (or ever at any point to be honest...not a patch on Giggs and Scholes). RvN might have been one of them at the time, but following his departure (combined with plenty of other factors) we actually started winning competitions again.
It's alright being a great goalscorer in a team that doesn't win trophies, but utltimately in my opinion, you can only be regarded as a great goalscorer if that team actually wins things.
Well that footballing brain should also tell him what to do when he has the ball with 30 seconds to go in such a close game. I know, I'll try to take on a man and lose the ball. I'm agree with Sults on this one.
Well that footballing brain should also tell him what to do when he has the ball with 30 seconds to go in such a close game. I know, I'll try to take on a man and lose the ball. I'm agree with Sults on this one.
Not having Beckham as the best player in that team back then (or ever at any point to be honest...not a patch on Giggs and Scholes). RvN might have been one of them at the time, but following his departure (combined with plenty of other factors) we actually started winning competitions again.
It's alright being a great goalscorer in a team that doesn't win trophies, but utltimately in my opinion, you can only be regarded as a great goalscorer if that team actually wins things.
It was obviously a stupid decision, but like people said, Hernandez was idiotic with his offside too yet absolutely no blame was put on him. I think Nani just has this reputation and whenever he does do something daft it's picked up on far, far quicker than other players.
So what, he scored a great goal and can celebrate how he likes considering he probably wont be in the team again for weeks.
and if he got past the man and scored everyone would say he's brilliant again. Obviously the rest of our squad are useless too then for not stopping an attack with 10 seconds to go from 80 yards away.
You are right there. I believe it is because of we as fans know how great he could be. He has immense talent and it's frustrating to watch him sometime because of some silly things he does. Although, I do remember feeling the same of Ronaldo before he became awesome.
I suppose there are arguments for both sides here, but with 30 seconds to go he shouldn't be trying such things when the game is on a knife edge IMO.
It was obviously a stupid decision, but like people said, Hernandez was idiotic with his offside too yet absolutely no blame was put on him. I think Nani just has this reputation and whenever he does do something daft it's picked up on far, far quicker than other players.
True, but some fans do genuinely just fecking hate him (not really on the caf, to be fair).
For me, the good far outweighs the bad when he's on form, I think I'm just at a stage where I learn to accept the few moments of inevitable stupidity in games. Besides, an on form confident Nani probably would've actually beaten his man at the end there.
True, but some fans do genuinely just fecking hate him (not really on the caf, to be fair).
For me, the good far outweighs the bad when he's on form, I think I'm just at a stage where I learn to accept the few moments of inevitable stupidity in games. Besides, an on form confident Nani probably would've actually beaten his man at the end there.
What is this 'Mean Girls II'?
It's much simpler than that. Last nights goal showed what he can do, so people then struggle when he fecks up the simpler things. Some of what Nani does wrong no pro should do, especiually as often as he does it. Fine if you think that's alright when he scores goals like he did last night, but what you refuse to understand is that some people prefer less ocassional razzmatazz and less simple mistakes.
True, but some fans do genuinely just fecking hate him (not really on the caf, to be fair).
For me, the good far outweighs the bad when he's on form, I think I'm just at a stage where I learn to accept the few moments of inevitable stupidity in games. Besides, an on form confident Nani probably would've actually beaten his man at the end there.
So Shearer,Greaves among others weren't great goalscorers? Baffling logic