I still don't know why Gaga started, he couldn't get anywhere near anyone all game. He's one of the crappest players playing for a big side ever and throwing Benzema in at the deep end was some straight coward shit from Pelegrini.
He's very often culpable in the big games. Liverpool last year he was muscled out of the match and left his defence having to cope with what, at times, was an onslaught.
Boss is the new FranklyVulgar.
La Liga as a whole is not strong anymore. The latest TV deal has absolutely destroyed any pretensions of parity.
They spent 250m Euros last summmer to come up horribly short, again.
La Liga was extremely competitive in the first five or so years of the 2000's, but it's just fodder for RM and Barca to collect points from now until they face each other, at which point RM get a raping, and the whole process is repeated.
Madrid are fecking shit? why? they had the same amount of points before the game against barca. That game was won with a goal by messi, and till that moment there was not much difference between both teams, in fact no one would have been surprised if Madrid scored the first
but messi did it
he played 8 times against real madrid and he scored 7 goals
was madrid always "fecking shit"? even when he scored three goals with a player less?
he's brilliant, and if he keeps playing like this, he might surpass maradona
Do you read RM forums? Have a look at what they think of their side.
Flat-track bullies that have been found out every time the level of opposition rises.
And Xavi was the man in that game - he was superb.
I didn't mention Messi, not sure why you have.
The major hole in your post is in not mentioning the expenditure of the rest of the league, which is a key factor in why that league is now fodderish for RM and Barca.Well yeah, because Real and Barca are both extremely good teams, whatever they've spent. It's not like the other teams collectively become worse by virtue of Barca and Real outspending everyone. It's still one of the top two leagues in the world.
It's a kind of weird logic that because Real and Barca outspend everyone and are running away at the top by a countrymile, therefore the teams in the league are not as good and therefore the quality of the teams that are running away with it are not as impressive.
It may be less competitive than in former years, but I don't think the quality of the league overall has lessened all that much. Barca and Real are ahead of the pack by virtue of being quite a lot better. Not because Spanish teams are awful in comparison to their European counterparts.
The'res a difference between the competitiveness of a league and the overall strength of it compared to other leagues.
i don' read real madrid forums, i watch real madrid games, and i think they are a really good team, with excellent players, like Ronaldo, Alonso, Higuain, Diarra, Van der Vart, but they happen to play in the same league that playes one of the best teams ever, Barcelona, with messi, xavi, pedro, piquet, puyol, abidal etc
you can say that they where beaten by Lyon in the CL, but if you watched both games, you'll see that the worst team won, as it happens a lot of times
The major hole in your post is in not mentioning the expenditure of the rest of the league, which is a key factor in why that league is now fodderish for RM and Barca.
Madrid alone outspent the entire league combined, iirc, outside of Barcelona. That's insane.
Where the hell do you expect them to end up with such an advantage over their opponents?
You'd be right if RM were still in the CL, but they went out with a whimper and back to battering sides who, from a financial POV, are not in their stratosphere, let alone their league. The first time they come up against a team that are... they got battered. Again.You have people here essentially saying:
Real have spent a truckload more than everyone and are running away with the league (except for barca who are better) - ergo, their league is now shite and the fact that Real have so many points doesn't say much about their quality.
Which really has no logical structure. It makes much more sense to simply say
Real have spent a truckload more than everyone and are running away with the league (except for barca who are better) - ergo, all that money has given Real a great side capable of running away from everyone in the overall secondbest league in the world. They are now actually really good.
which is why it's bollocks when you have people saying this Real Madrid team is shite, etc. That kind of conclusion comes from not distinguishing between quality and comparative competitiveness of a league. The quality of la liga isn't lessened by Real outspending everyone, even if it does make it less competitive and the footballing quality of their team isn't less just because it cost a fortune.
They are extremely good, have shown it in the league and ought to be recognised as such, even if they are not as good as barca. You don't hit record point tallies without being very good.
They have a hangup in Europe, but frankly I think it's a matter of a hurdle for them to overcome before they re-assert themselves there. They clearly have the quality to be up there with the best.
Brazilian legend, Pele, has given some advice to Barcelona playmaker Lionel Messi , with the Argentinean being hailed as one of the greatest players of all time.
Pele: "They are always trying to compare someone to Pele. But I always joke with my Argentine firends that they must first choose who is the best player from Argentina. Then, when one of them scores a thousand goals, then we can start talking."
The 69-year-old added on Messi: "He's a great player. He plays very well for Barcelona, but has failed to show his talent with the Argentina team. Maybe he can at the World Cup. Let's wait and see."
The former Brazil number 10 famously scored 1,280 goals in 1,363 games whilst Messi so far has 133 goals in his short career.
Pele scored over 1000 goals in the Brazilian and US leagues. They're shit.
This..plus actually there were no defense back then even in Europe
This..plus actually there were no defense back then even in Europe
What's funny Spoons, is that every time you speak, those who think Messi's level has never been seen before, see you as a naysayer and a bitter person stuck in the past.
What they don't seem to realise is that the ability, heart, courage and game-turning ability Maradona had couldn't be recreated if you took the very best of: Xavi(passing, vision, execution, controlling of the tempo of games), Iniesta(impishness, guile and cunning), Messi(dribbling, goal-scoring, certainty and composure) and Puyol(never say die and all that)... even then you're missing Maradona's expert free kick ability and spirit/will to win.
To them, Spoons, you'll always be a naysayer because all the stuff seen in the true greats seems like pure fantasy and bollocks to those who never got to see it at the time and have no interest in investigating it properly for themselves.
On paper i'd say it's stronger than Barcelonas but they are a relatively new team.
I think you're being too generous. Having watched Barcelona B jizz all over a strong Spurs team in pre-season, it's clear they have a number of hidden gems all schooled in the same style of play. Pedro for example came from practically nowhere to perform as arguably the best finisher in European football this season.
You'd need to be extremely good at arguing, even then, you'd still be laughed at for that suggestion.
Agreed, Forti.
Funny thing is they're making comparisons when they've only seen a decade of football. Kids eh.
While Pedro is not the best finisher in Europe and far less the best striker, this season he has rarely squandered a chance. Saturday's el classico which just another example as I'm sure you will have been gutted to see. The stats are supportive as well:
Goals-to-Shots Ratio
Pedro 1 : 2.4 (17 goals)
Milito 1 : 3.8 (25 goals)
Torres 1 : 5.1 (23 goals)
Villa 1 : 5.3 (33 goals)
Ibra 1 : 6.0 (22 goals)
Rooney 1 : 6.2 (40 goals - including WC qualifying matches)
Eboue 1 : 8.0
Obviously with any statistic it is important to look at the context which is that some of those other strikers might have more pot-shots from distance. Nevertheless it remains an impressive feat and a fair reflection of Pedro's precise finishing this season.
Goals-to-Shots Ratio
Pedro 1 : 2.4 (17 goals)
Milito 1 : 3.8 (25 goals)
Torres 1 : 5.1 (23 goals)
Villa 1 : 5.3 (33 goals)
Ibra 1 : 6.0 (22 goals)
Rooney 1 : 6.2 (40 goals - including WC qualifying matches)
Eboue 1 : 8.0
CorrectWhat's funny Spoons, is that every time you speak, those who think Messi's level has never been seen before, see you as a naysayer and a bitter person stuck in the past.
What they don't seem to realise is that the ability, heart, courage and game-turning ability Maradona had couldn't be recreated if you took the very best of: Xavi(passing, vision, execution, controlling of the tempo of games), Iniesta(impishness, guile and cunning), Messi(dribbling, goal-scoring, certainty and composure) and Puyol(never say die and all that)... even then you're missing Maradona's expert free kick ability and spirit/will to win.
To them, Spoons, you'll always be a naysayer because all the stuff seen in the true greats seems like pure fantasy and bollocks to those who never got to see it at the time and have no interest in investigating it properly for themselves.
While Pedro is not the best finisher in Europe and far less the best striker, this season he has rarely squandered a chance. Saturday's el classico which just another example as I'm sure you will have been gutted to see. The stats are supportive as well:
Goals-to-Shots Ratio
Pedro 1 : 2.4 (17 goals)
Milito 1 : 3.8 (25 goals)
Torres 1 : 5.1 (23 goals)
Villa 1 : 5.3 (33 goals)
Ibra 1 : 6.0 (22 goals)
Rooney 1 : 6.2 (40 goals - including WC qualifying matches)
Eboue 1 : 8.0
Obviously with any statistic it is important to look at the context which is that some of those other strikers might have more pot-shots from distance. Nevertheless it remains an impressive feat and a fair reflection of Pedro's precise finishing this season.
That's actually a ringing endorsement for Messi, seeing as Pele's such a wrong bastard about everything.
No jokes. It was typical Pele. Great at being wrong and foot in mouth momments. Karma for what he used to do to keepers and defnders I guess
classic Pele. Is it odd that the two greatest of all time seem to be a bit wrong in the head off the pitch?
Fine line between genius and being plain insane. Still this is Pele being a bit over the top. Still in the context of it he might have been having a little joke which is lost in translation or lost in the writing.
While Pedro is not the best finisher in Europe and far less the best striker, this season he has rarely squandered a chance. Saturday's el classico which just another example as I'm sure you will have been gutted to see. The stats are supportive as well:
Goals-to-Shots Ratio
Pedro 1 : 2.4 (17 goals)
Milito 1 : 3.8 (25 goals)
Torres 1 : 5.1 (23 goals)
Villa 1 : 5.3 (33 goals)
Ibra 1 : 6.0 (22 goals)
Rooney 1 : 6.2 (40 goals - including WC qualifying matches)
Eboue 1 : 8.0
Obviously with any statistic it is important to look at the context which is that some of those other strikers might have more pot-shots from distance. Nevertheless it remains an impressive feat and a fair reflection of Pedro's precise finishing this season.
But players could kick opposition attackers far more though. Maradona, Best, and Pele were tackled and kicked in a way Messi never will be which makes comparing them hard.
Have you seen the "defending" in La Liga or lack there of to be precise?