To be honest even I don't have a real problem with the second.It took around 4 replays and a freeze frame to conclusively say the second was outside. Hard to blame the ref for that when it was moving so fast and the players fell into the box.
Based on this game, he's not. He's called a fair game uptil now.
To be honest even I don't have a real problem with the second.
Still, another decision going against us. And it probably wouldn't have come about if he'd correctly not given the first...
Is mockers a west ham fan?
It doesn't bloody matter if it was unnatural! Unnatural does not equal deliberate. Anyway thinking about it, that was the lino's fault.How was the first not a penalty? Whatever the distance, the unnatural positioning of his hands was reckless.
No I'm a Wum. I thought you'd established that?
Like I said, Lee Mason did his job.It's painful when it's against us but beautiful when it goes our way.
We have nothing to complain about today.
Vidic could have been sent off.
It's just you having no clue about the rules.
He was fine. Gave a couple of decisions to WH but thats to be expected when you play away.
I'm not entirely sure how serious I was when I said this, but I'm being proven right..
We have nothing to complain about today.
Vidic could have been sent off.
...and wrong. Over the course of the same game.
Agree with the bit in bold. It's WHU that should be complaining.
I think the Vidic yellow was just about right but no way was our pen a pen.
What a stupid thread, Mason was excellent today, if anything we got the best of his decisions, Vidic didn't get sent off and the handball for our penalty was far less blatant than Evra's.
Did Evra deliberately handle the ball? No, it hit his hand, which he tried to withdraw. No penalty.