Rashford has hit over 20 goals the last two seasons playing through injury that needed surgery. He will be lethal when fully fit, an injury affecting your spine, neck or shoulders can completley throw your equilibrium off, plus he lost his explosiveness. I would agree Cavani (who can't play multiple times per week for the 90) and Greenwood are better finishers but Rashford continually finds himself or creates for himself, goal scoring positions and can commit defenders better than anyone in our squad except Pogba.He's not imo. Cavani and Greenwood are both bigger threats. Not to mention Sancho based on his Dortmund form.
Nope. The proven, season long consistency of Paul Pogba will keep him out
I know yeah, City usually have about 30 attackers and they do fineHe’ll play plenty. We are allowed to have more than 11 good players ffs
I don't remember a bad game form Pogba as a LAM, he's class there it's when he's deeper, he can switch off.Nope. The proven, season long consistency of Paul Pogba will keep him out
Dear Sir/Ma'am, your age is leakingSeason ticket holder 14 years, fan for 35+ years.
You?.....have you ever even been to a game?
I don't remember a bad game form Pogba as a LAM, he's class there it's when he's deeper, he can switch off.
I think Rashford will slowly get back to play LF, while Pogba will unfortunately need to drop to CM, and then we are back to decide coin flip how good he will play in games. Perhaps Varane in the back4 and easier games can motivate Pogba a bit more and make him more dependable, he's capable of that for sure.
Ai. We’ve never seen United play great without Rashford .Manchester United's premiership ambition problems highlighted right there, above...
It was great watching United against Leeds today without consistent sitters being missed, and basic poor decision-making being administered...
I don't disagree with anything said by you. They will rotate but Rashford is clearly the best form Left and would be luxurious to bench him and so that Pogba gets more gametime from deep as opposed to his advanced playmaker role starting from the left.Pogba played a free role today where he drifted and played alot of his time centrally as a CAM/CM as said by Ole.
We can't always play Pogba like that and we will sometimes need the opposite of what Pogba offers, ie the width of the left wing, the goal scoring ability of an inverted forward etc.
It's good we have the ability of both, a creative option and a goalscoring one.
That's why this thread is disappointing- it's trying to create a problem when there really isn't one.
Rashford has plenty of technical ability from a standing start or at slow speeds. He's capable of doing brilliant things with the ball. The issue is that he does lose that ability as he speeds up and he does basically become a fairly clumsy kick and run merchant, which means he's not capable of skillful dribbling in the way players like Giggs, Ronaldo, Hazard or plenty of other players can do.His ability to go past players is more to do with his rapid speed and acceleration than actual ability to go through tight spaces.
Even in that clip, he kicks the ball and runs down the wing. That is not what I mean by technical ability.
I don't understand why you and others get so defensive when I say Rashford is not that good technically. Compared to Pogba and Sancho, he's just not.
But he's an altogether different type of threat and it's great we have him as an option.
I don't think Rashford is as good as Pogba when both are on form, and he's not got the same potential as Greenwood or Sancho. I'm sure Rashford will get a lot of games but to me, like Martial, he shouldn't be a first team regular.
If you looked at Rashford early on in his career and compare it to now, there isn't a lot of progression there. Even his biggest fans have to admit he hasn't kicked on like you hope a 19/20 year old will do. He'll be 24 when he next plays for United and yet some of his most impressive showings were under LVG.
Aa a project, I just think United would be better off backing Greenwood. His ceiling is far higher.
Your tagI love early season reactions, by December when you are playing 3 games in 7 days, dealing with injuries, you’ll be moaning about not having more competent attackers instead of Dan James or Jessie Lingard.
Rashford's best form was in 19/20 before he had the double stress fracture in his back. He was pretty much carrying our attack at the time and was one of the best performing players in the league. Really looked like he was in the process of stepping up to a truly world class level.I don't think Rashford is as good as Pogba when both are on form, and he's not got the same potential as Greenwood or Sancho. I'm sure Rashford will get a lot of games but to me, like Martial, he shouldn't be a first team regular.
If you looked at Rashford early on in his career and compare it to now, there isn't a lot of progression there. Even his biggest fans have to admit he hasn't kicked on like you hope a 19/20 year old will do. He'll be 24 when he next plays for United and yet some of his most impressive showings were under LVG.
Aa a project, I just think United would be better off backing Greenwood. His ceiling is far higher.
Yes.While Greenwood, Sancho, Pogba, Bruno and Cavani are fit and at their best, where does that leave Rashford when he's back?
I would never want to lose him but if we replace Cavani with Haaland next summer, the situation looks even worse. I'm assuming Pogba stays obviously.
Would he be satisfied with a part-time role?
Manchester United's premiership ambition problems highlighted right there, above...
It was great watching United against Leeds today without consistent sitters being missed, and basic poor decision-making being administered...