Henderson to Newcastle on loan?

UpWithRivers said:
Its up to us if we support them and help them though isnt it?
Click to expand...
Not really. Newcastle's owners will probably stay there for many years to come, regardless if we sell them our fringe players or not. If they pay what we want, would be stupid to not sell/loan just because there is a slight possibility they would get relegated without having Henderson in goal... We should focus on ourselves and worry less who will be relegated or won't be. Even if they will, they will come back immediately a year after. What does it change really?
 
dove said:
Not really. Newcastle's owners will probably stay there for many years to come, regardless if we sell them our fringe players or not. If they pay what we want, would be stupid to not sell/loan just because there is a slight possibility they would get relegated without having Henderson in goal... We should focus on ourselves and worry less who will be relegated or won't be. Even if they will, they will come back immediately a year after. What does it change really?
Click to expand...
Its this 'What does it matter' logic that causes all of the worlds problems. We in the midst of a abuse of women sandal but lets support/do business with a fundamentalist regime that treats women like sht. Oh what does it matter. We are against Russians threats of invasion against Ukraine but who cares that Chelsea are owned by them and fly the flag at their ground. Who cares Giggs is still allowed to come to Old Trafford and laud it up in the directors box. Yeah you're right. None of it matters. Its nothing to do with us. Lets just turn a blind eye as long as we get a few quid from it.
 
UpWithRivers said:
Its this 'What does it matter' logic that causes all of the worlds problems. We in the midst of a abuse of women sandal but lets support/do business with a fundamentalist regime that treats women like sht. Oh what does it matter. We are against Russians threats of invasion against Ukraine but who cares that Chelsea are owned by them and fly the flag at their ground. Who cares Giggs is still allowed to come to Old Trafford and laud it up in the directors box. Yeah you're right. None of it matters. Its nothing to do with us. Lets just turn a blind eye as long as we get a few quid from it.
Click to expand...
We have Saudi money in club. Our main sponsor used kids as workers and payed them 1$ per day. We can go like this all day for every big club.
If you want to take morale high ground then do it properly (stop watching United and football in general).
 
Andycoleno9 said:
We have Saudi money in club. Our main sponsor used kids as workers and payed them 1$ per day. We can go like this all day for every big club.
If you want to take morale high ground then do it properly (stop watching United and football in general).
Click to expand...
You might as well say leave Greenwood alone the Saudis do worse. Oh and Giggs was at Old Trafford so he should get away with it. Heck what about George Best. Why are is everyone complaining. Loads of people have done worse. Its a stupid non argument. You can literally use that get out clause for anything. Why give money to kids Charity and support United. Why help an old lady across the road and support Newcastle. Why say you are against the genocide of Uyghurs when half the stuff in your house is from China. We might as well all give up and just accept all the fkin sick sht in this world then
 
I really don't see much win for United to loan him out, so why should they? Very risky if De Gea would get injured.
 
We dont really gain anything on this deal. Sell him on or he stays as number 2
 
Move him on. Then Luckhurst will have another channel to the club blocked.
 
We must always ensure there are two goalies are on our bench to give us more options :drool:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.