that's from yesterday and is the whole reason this thread was started buddy.
Damn! Why do I have a life outside this forum!
that's from yesterday and is the whole reason this thread was started buddy.
IT's just paper bollocks i think. We're usually linked with everyone, and this year we've been linked with pretty much every midfielder going.this rumour makes little sense
It's more people not saying anything if they are open to sell / leave. Specifically saying that a player wont be sold and the player himself saying he doesn't want to move generally means he isn't going to leave his current club. If they say nothing then it usually means they do want to go, like Rooney.I don't get this belief that prior to this date the norm for big transfers has been for each to be proceeded by a public statement of intent to sell or leave. Why has this now suddenly just appeared on the horizon as a necessary criteria for a transfer to happen? I don't recall anyone, ever, having this in mind before. I suspect the reason it's in mind now is to go along with this 'everything we do is incompetent - whatever it is' mindset that's going around.
As soon as one rumour goes a little bit cold, they just make another one up.
asked for Mata + 10m for Rooney.
If we value Rooney at £40m, offering him to a striker deprived Spurs, plus £30m, would give Levy his £70m deal. It would solve a problem for both clubs, admittedly they'd be losing Bale a year early, but would they attract a striker of Rooney's quality next year?
Nah, course not. United are only a little club; there's no way we'd be interested in a player of Gareth Bale's standard. Well, we might be interested, but that means feck all to a small club such as ourselves - we're dreaming if we think lowly Manchester United will ever try to buy one of the best players in England!
Are we willing to splash out 80 million plus? More than doubling our previous transfer record? Because Leby will want a bidding war if he does resign himself to losing Bale...65 million is going to be nowhere near enough money. Madrid will break the world record transfer to get him..that much is obvious like.
Only chance we get Bale is if he digs his heels in and wants to come.
Are we willing to splash out 80 million plus? More than doubling our previous transfer record? Because Leby will want a bidding war if he does resign himself to losing Bale...65 million is going to be nowhere near enough money. Madrid will break the world record transfer to get him..that much is obvious like.
They can attempt to break whatever the feck they want but if Bale wants to stay in England(which I think he will), it means nothing. I also can't beleive that you'd consider 65m not nearly enough. I'd say Spurs would definitely consider accepting a bid like that from an English club anyway.
I think 65 million is a bit too much for Bale...but if he is off...and even if h wants to stay in this country there is serious money at City for example. I think the price will get pushed up whatever happens. Who cares where Bale wants to go? Makes no difference to Levy getting a bidding war going anyway.
You, to be fair mate, have no idea whether Bale has his heart set on staying in England, unless he has told you that. It is alot of money yes...but I can't see us being the only bidders and therefor can see his price rocketing.
Maybe we can chuck in Young as a sweetner.
Of course I don't, it's just my opinion. I just get the impression that he'd prefer and is more suited to the English game. He'd also have to establish himself all over again if he went to Madrid, where as he already has a positive reputation over here.
I can see him going abroad later in his career, but not any time soon IMO.
Would Bale prefer to play just behind RvP, or do you see him as a left winger only?
Would Bale prefer to play just behind RvP, or do you see him as a left winger only?
Spurs would accept a bid of £60m for Bale.
Spurs would accept a bid of £60m for Bale.
I agree with Edgio and londonred he plays basically the same role Ronaldo does at Madrid, he has that free license to roam and cause damage wherever he wants. With positionally flexible players like Kagawa, Nani and Van Persie who can cause damage from a number of positions it would work well imo.
70 million plus Young or just 60 million cash. The latter would probably be more tempting for Levy.
Fair enough...I can't see it myself. Especially when Levy knows that more than one club will want him.
Erm, do you want to reword that? Or are we valuing Young at minus 20m or something?![]()
That's why he'll cost as much as £60m.
I think that might, just might, have been the joke![]()
That's why I see the fee going north of 60 million...again just my opinion. We offer 60...Levy sits on it a few days. There isn't an immediate no so Madrid and City think 'We'll have some of this'. The next thing it's 65, 70, 75 blah blah blah.
The longer Levy drags it out the better for him. He'd be batshit to just accept 60 million from us without seeing what PSG/Madrid are going to do.