acnumber9
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2006
- Messages
- 22,495
Not really and for what purpose?The media.
Not really and for what purpose?The media.
The counter/increased offer hasn't materialised yet then?
I can't imagine they've just given up already, perhaps there are discussions going on on the basis of "How much do you want then?", or talking to Fabregas & his agent.
Why are Barca fans so keen to see the back of him? Was he that bad? There's more chance of him being a success in Barcas midfield 3 as opposed to our midfield 2.
Not really and for what purpose?
I disagree with you mate. Explain this: most of our tranfers come out of the blue, we keep'em quiet. Why did leak this one??
Why did we bid well below the market value? Why did we bit after Barca lost Thiago??
The question was in the post you quoted previously. What's the plan?
Making 'fake' bids doesn't give us secrecy. You think the people who feed stories to the papers will stop because we bid for another player? Did being linked with Thiago stop us being linked to other players?Yes really and because United like secrecy with transfer deals.
It was an open question. It can't be answered with the word no.No. There's your answer.
Making 'fake' bids doesn't give us secrecy. You think the people who feed stories to the papers will stop because we bid for another player? Did being linked with Thiago stop us being linked to other players?
People will use any unlikely transfer in history to justify a next one Cantona, Van Persie etc. each moved for different reasons. If we are weighing up what we do know then the likelihood is Fabregas doesn't come here. No harm in hoping but some of you trying to convince the rest of us need to leave it out, we watch football and follow the news and the club the same way you do. Bidding for Fabregas is a great signal of intent without signing him. It lets people know the calibre of player we will be aiming for. I think the club purposely leaked the information we never give out transfer news until the deal is basically done....
Bidding for Fabregas is a great signal of intent without signing him.
And bidding for Fabregas and, allegedly, Thiago gives a pretty good signal that Moyes is very aware of what we lack in midfield, which should please a lot of people on here...
Which is what my first thought was.I'd believe it if the public pursuit of Fabregas is a tactic to allow United to get on with their real targets. That way even if this approach for Fabregas fails a new midfielder will be announced around the same time. No idea who though.
It was an open question. It can't be answered with the word no.
A signal of intent would actually be signing him. Its not like clubs or supporters will be going "remember when United bid for Fabregas? That was amazing.They really showed they mean business"
Come on man everyone should know the calibre of player we are aiming for. Shouldn't need bids to reinforce that.
Comments:
RedCafe "Nos vemos en Manchester"
Ok, who was it?
If he joins you guys I'll eat my hat along with these words.
No bidding is also a signal of our intent to go out and spend money to get the best players. Right now fans are happy to see us going for this calibre of player (instead of Felliani etc.) I also said it ends up meaning nothing unless we sign him.
Apologies. Why won't you tell us your plan? It's an easy task apparently.What the feckery jimbob are you talking about?
You might need to retrace your steps ac....y'know as you've got a lot on in this thread.
Apologies. Why won't you tell us your plan? It's an easy task apparently.
Maybe it's not that easy and you're full of hot air.I might tell someone...just not you...because you have been a pesky arse.
Of course were not bidding for him knowing we have no chance of getting him.
Yeh but we shouldn't need public bids to reinforce that perception. It should just "be there."
United management must know something we don't, even if what they "know" is that Barcelona wouldn't mind cashing in on Fabregas.
For us mere posters, we can only know what's in the public domain and speculate on that basis. Speculating on what we know right now, there's little chance of us landing Fabregas. But that's not to say there's ZERO chance of that happening. I'd say it's close to zero, however. A zero chance target would be Messi, Iniesta, Xavi, Schweinsteiger, Thiago Silva and the like.
If you're playing the odds, bet against United procuring Fabregas. But we did land RvP last season, so you can't really rule this one completely out.
Why the feck would the club either want or need to signal intent to anybody?
Who are they signalling to?
The cnut ran his contract down to blackmail us to selling him for a reduced fee or lose him for nothing on a Bosman.
I just hope we won't have to wait 3 weeks for final answer.
Van Persie Arsenal's hand was forced in this situation not as much.
The cnut ran his contract down to blackmail us to selling him for a reduced fee or lose him for nothing on a Bosman.