Hope I'm wrong of course but to splash that much cash on an unknown quantity with a handful of starts who is unable to consistently start for Rangers doesnt bode well, hence the similarity on the surface. Of course there are loads of variables to consider (not claiming to be a Rangers expert) but speaking objectively particularly where there are so many glaring gaps in the squad that 30odd mill could have been spent better elsewhereNot even remotely similar situations but good effort.
Considering his technical ability you'd certainly think ten Hag would find a use for him.I have huge faith. The ability is obvious, and he’s still young. I’d be keen to see how he does should we become a football team.
It's a strategy we're awful at. Liverpool seem decent at it (all those 15m+ transfers to Bournemouth) and Chelsea are the masters at stockpiling young talent to then sell on for a profit. We always get below market value for our players so we should just pause and reflect. Pellistiri and Amad cost how much?Dalot is a better example. Played 6 games for Porto when we bought him, like Diallo had played 4 games for Atalanta.
I get the idea is to get in early before their value skyrockets but it's an incredibly risky strategy
To be fair Hannibal is a year younger cost 4m without adds on. If you are going to include Hannibal's adds on then you should include Amad's adds on of 35m or something. James Wilson killed it in our academy and didn't perform at senior level. If Amad isn't going to be used at all next season and we need funds, I wouldn't mind moving on from Amad because it hasn't been worked well between us and him. I'm sure there will be better club that can maximise his true potential. Of course, if we don't need fund or he's part of the manager's plan next season then I would keep Amad. We shouldn't be stopping this guy's development if we don't know how to manage and develop him.
There's no similarities at all. Bebe was signed off the back of a recommendation from Quieroz, who happened share an agent with Bebe, only a month after signing for his previous club. There was never any hype or promise surrounding him and was signed in dubious circumstances which even prompted a police investigation.Hope I'm wrong of course but to splash that much cash on an unknown quantity with a handful of starts who is unable to consistently start for Rangers doesnt bode well, hence the similarity on the surface. Of course there are loads of variables to consider (not claiming to be a Rangers expert) but speaking objectively particularly where there are so many glaring gaps in the squad that 30odd mill could have been spent better elsewhere
There's no similarities at all. Bebe was signed off the back of a recommendation from Quieroz, who happened share an agent with Bebe, only a month after signing for his previous club. There was never any hype or promise surrounding him and was signed in dubious circumstances which even prompted a police investigation.
Amad was the best player at one of the best academies in Italy, who was being followed by City after he tore their youth team a new one in the Youth League, and was signed due to a panic on missing out on Sancho. Regarded by our scouts as being the best U19 in Europe after Ansu Fati.
Yeah, think I'll trust the actual youth experts and scouts over you on this one mate.Nope, he was just a kid. Atalanta’s CFO was also thinking the offer was 4m instead of 40m because of a typo.
Yeah, think I'll trust the actual youth experts and scouts over you on this one mate.
If the original thread still exists, you cannot say you were not warned.
Both clubs negotiated the fee and reached an agreement, yes it's too expansive but you don't need to bullshit us with a story of Atlanta CFO expecting a 4m and getting 40m instead
I remember you being quite bitter on Juve missing out on Amad as Juve usually has first dibs on any promising player in Italy. Juve were hoping to repeat the trick of purchasing Atalanta's best young player as you did with Kulusevski the year before.Nope, he was just a kid. Atalanta’s CFO was also thinking the offer was 4m instead of 40m because of a typo.
I'm the same. The lad was levels above in the reserve team. I think he's on par with Mejbri in terms of talent. He's also shown glimpses in the first team. We can even see the talent in the recent clip above from Rangers training. I think ETH will love him.I have huge faith. The ability is obvious, and he’s still young. I’d be keen to see how he does should we become a football team.
It happens I’m from Bergamo and… never mind, you are right. Another whisper is your scouts got a qui-pro-quo with Amad’s fake brother Hamad Traore, who is now doing very well at Sassuolo. However, you all have seen Amad for 1.5 years by now and can make your own assessment. He will probably go to the Netherlands and try a breakthrough at professional level in a free flowing, attacking minded league.
I remember you being quite bitter on Juve missing out on Amad as Juve usually has first dibs on any promising player in Italy. Juve were hoping to repeat the trick of purchasing Atalanta's best young player as you did with Kulusevski the year before.
With a new manager and a new playing styke incoming, that’s way too many ‘if’s’ to end up with a ‘should’, if you get my meaning.
I think the only thing we should by now, is let Ten Hag take a look at him in pre-season and make an evaluation. If he thinks Amad lacks too much to get opportunities, if he thinks the money saved holds more value than his potential after another loan, he should do as he sees fit, also in relation to what RW alternatives we manage to have by that time.
Well, that's what forum is about, discussion.
Huh? This comparison between values strikes me as weird. You're saying Kane and Declan Rice aren't worth the money they'd cost, but whatever that value is we know they're bloody good footballers, among the top players in their position in the league, and possibly in the world in Kane's case.He only cost £21m. There were £16m in add-ons based on appearances and achievements which likely have not been met.
Should we be worried about the extra £5m we overpaid on Amad? Not really. Our issue with recruitment is not the deals for Amad, but it's the idiocy of buying players who already don't fit our system/culture like Lukaku, Di Maria, Pogba, AWB, Maguire for £20-30m inflated values.
It's giving young players like Rashford/Martial ridiculous guaranteed contracts £75k/wk above what they deserve. Why do we pay our GK squad more than the entire bottom 4 EPL teams pay their entire squad?
Being financially smart starts by saying no to Declan, Kane. Players who aren't worth the money they'd cost.
I remember thinking at the time Sancho was dead, because we spent so much on 2 RWs. I was young and foolish.I still don't understand why we spent close to or maybe more than 70m on three players Ole had no use for when that amount would have been enough to bring in Rice at the time, or Grealish at the time, players we desperately needed. Rice especially, but Grealish would have been a fantastic acquisition for us, his performances for City notwithstanding.
Same for most of us.I remember thinking at the time Sancho was dead, because we spent so much on 2 RWs. I was young and foolish.
Immediate impact in the Derby today!! Yellow after 20 seconds
Wonder if Rangers would be interested in a swap deal for Fashion Sakala
great nameWonder if Rangers would be interested in a swap deal for Fashion Sakala
Debate on Diallo ongoing on Rangers forum at the moment if anyone is interested.
https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/amad-diallo-next-season.204688/page-2#post-11478065